YESTERDAY the power failed in Sydney’s central business district and there was chaos. The cross-city tunnel was closed and many people became trapped in lifts in high-rise buildings and in traffic gridlock. This reminder of the importance of electricity came to the city that invented Earth Hour and just two days after Earth Hour 2009.
The following piece written by Bjorn Lomborg reflects on the Earth Hour campaign and alternatives, he writes: “A real danger is that Earth Hour convinced people we were making progress on climate change when we were not. And it let business and government off the hook. There is still no cheap replacement for the carbon that we burn. This is the reason many promises of drastic CO2 cuts remain just empty promises and why past global agreements to cut CO2 have gone unfulfilled. A meaningful solution to global warming needs to focus on research into and development of clean energy, instead of fixating on empty promises of carbon emission reductions.”
Hour of no power increases emissions
By Bjorn Lomborg
IN Australia, where Earth Hour started, it evidently enjoys strong support from politicians, celebrities, corporate backers and the public. The efforts this Saturday certainly will be well-intentioned. Many of us worry about global warming and would like to be part of the solution. Unfortunately, this event – as with many public proposals on climate change – is an entirely symbolic gesture that creates the mistaken impression that there are easy, quick fixes to climate change. One provincial British newspaper wrote this week: “Saving the planet could be as easy as switching off the lights in South Tyneside, green campaigners say.”
It will take more than the metropolitan borough of South Tyneside, population 152,000, to solve global warming. Even if a billion people turn off their lights this Saturday, the entire event will be equivalent to switching off China’s emissions for six short seconds. In economic terms, the environmental and humanitarian benefits from the efforts of the entire developed world would add up to just $21,000.
The campaign doesn’t ask anybody to do anything difficult, such as coping without heating, air-conditioning, telephones, the internet, hot food or cold drinks. Conceivably, if you or I sat in our houses watching television, with the heater and computer running, we could claim we’re part of an answer to global warming, so long as the lights are switched off. The symbolism is almost perverse.
In Australia last year, Earth Hour’s organisers required participating businesses to pledge to reduce their emissions by 5 per cent during the following year. This year, that requirement has been dropped. “We decided we’d actually downplay (concrete cuts)this time,” the chief executive of WWF Australia told The Sunday Age. There apparently has been no accounting of whether last year’s sponsors lived up to their pledge. The Sunday Age reported last week: “An analysis of the key sponsors of Earth Hour reveals that most have reported increased emissions in their most recent figures.”
And it gets worse: the event could cause higher overall pollution than if we just left our lights on. When asked to extinguish electricity, people turn to candlelight. Candles seem natural, but are almost 100 times less efficient than incandescent light globes, and more than 300 times less efficient than fluorescent lights. If you use one candle for each extinguished globe, you’re essentially not cutting CO2 at all, and with two candles you’ll emit more CO2. Moreover, candles produce indoor air pollution 10 to 100 times the level of pollution caused by all cars, industry and electricity production.
No wonder that even committed climate campaigners are sceptical. Clive Hamilton, author of Scorcher: The Dirty Politics of Climate Change, told The Sunday Age last week that “we are well past the time for feel-good exercises aimed at raising awareness. It’s like the band playing on as the Titanic sinks.”
He said there was a real danger that Earth Hour convinced people we were making progress on climate change when we were not. And it let business and government off the hook.
There is still no cheap replacement for the carbon that we burn. This is the reason many promises of drastic CO2 cuts remain just empty promises and why past global agreements to cut CO2 have gone unfulfilled.
A meaningful solution to global warming needs to focus on research into and development of clean energy, instead of fixating on empty promises of carbon emission reductions.
It is vital to make solar and other new technology cheaper than fossil fuels quickly so we can turn off carbon energy sources for a lot longer than one hour and keep the planet running. Every country should agree to spend 0.05 per cent of its gross domestic product on low-carbon energy research and development. The total global cost would be 10 times greater than present spending, yet be 10 times less than the cost of the Kyoto Protocol on carbon emission reductions. This response to global warming is a realistic, achievable one.
Fossil fuels literally gave us an enlightenment, by lighting our world and giving us protection from the fury of the elements. It is ironic that today’s pure symbolism should hark back to a darker age.
Republished from the Australian newspaper with permission.
Bjorn Lomborg is the director of Denmark-based think tank the Copenhagen Consensus Centre, adjunct professor at the Copenhagen Business School, and author of ‘Cool It’ and ‘The Skeptical Environmentalist’.
Sydney falls apart at the seams. http://www.smh.com.au/national/sydney-falls-apart-at-the-seams-20090331-9hcw.html
“A Fault in one of four critical cables yesterday triggered a two-hour shutdown in all of them.
The power failure affected more than 100,000 people … from 4.40pm to 6.35pm. NSW Fire Brigades responded to 195 requests for help, including 34 lift rescues in the CBD, as workers were left stranded while trying to leave their darkened buildings.
Energy Australia said the blackout was caused by a fault in one of four major 132,000 Volt cables that supply power to parts of the CBD, the inner city and eastern suburbs.
The fault in that cable triggered a shut down in two other cables needed to service the area plus a fourth “backup” cable.”
spangled drongo says
I s’pose the AGW religion has to start off rather pathetic, feeble and feel-good to gather converts.
I’m sure there are many of the hierarchy who have “Sharia Law” in mind eventually.
Think I’ll join the Methuselah Soc to see how it all pans out.
But then again……..
Hi SD; don’t be rash with whom you join; make a considered and rational choice and join these guys;
I see Bjorn managed to mention Hamilton; just think, Hamilton and the Age; it’s like measles and mumps, influenza and diarrhea; the pits.
Sid Reynolds says
So Sydney has had a real ‘earth hour’. Or ‘earth 2 hours’ to be exact! Well, get used to it Sydney, and other major metro centres as well. No major base load power stations built in the last 25 years, and demand continueing to rise…. Expect more and more of the same…..
People trapped in lifts; traffic chaos; and add to it trains running out of power between station, in tunnels and on the harbour bridge. And those new religious icons, the wind turbines failing to cope.!!!
People will finally wake up to the massive fraud of AGW which has been visited upon them.
spangled drongo says
I’m member No. 10
spangled drongo says
Yair Sid, Labor govts’ solution to all crises: constipate yourself with the philosophy of several warring factions then sprinkle a goodly serve of AGW on top and you have the recipe for long term gridlock.
Reminds me of the good old days of the Bunnerong Power House and the Mo McKackie radio shows.
Rob W says
So Sydney gets a blackout for a couple of hours and it make national news for a week.
I lose my power for 28 hours and no one cares, i can see why it pays to live in the big smoke not out here feeding you all.