Following is the text* from a ‘Special Climate Statement’ entitled ‘Climate conditions preceding the December 2006 southeast Australian bushfires’. The statement was issued on 19th December 2006 by the National Climate Centre.
Introduction
Southeast Australia has experienced highly unusual widespread bushfire activity in December 2006. These fires were preceded by exceptionally dry conditions, over both the short and long term, in all of the major fire regions (Victorian Alps, Tumut, and eastern Tasmania). In the two mainland regions, exceptionally high daytime temperatures also occurred during the months leading up to the fires. This statement describes the antecedent climatic conditions in the fire-affected regions.
Severe and extensive bushfires in southeast Australia are usually a result of an extended drought which leads to the drying of forests and grasslands. In most summers, there are a number of days on which high temperatures combine with low humidity and high winds to produce dangerous fire weather conditions. When combined with ignition, the antecedent dry and extreme weather set the stage for potentially severe bushfires.
The short-term weather conditions during the fire period itself are not within the scope of this statement, and will likely to form part of a separate report on meteorological aspects of the fires to be released at a later date.
Most of the affected areas are mountainous, with relatively sparse meteorological station networks. In addition, the networks in the affected regions have changed substantially over time, with a number of automatic weather stations recently being installed at high elevations. The changes in the station network mean that the gridded analyses are likely to underestimate the severity of the current dry period at high elevations, while the shorter-duration station records miss some previous exceptional drought episodes (such as 1902 and 1914). For these reasons, this report uses a mix of station and gridded data sets. The gridded datasets are the Bureau’s operational 0.25 degree (~25 km) resolution analyses dating back to 1900 and experimental new 0.05 degree (~5 km)
analyses which currently extend back to 1941.
Long-term rainfall deficits in SE Australia
Rainfall has been generally below normal in most of south-eastern Australia (including Tasmania) for the 10-year period starting late 1996 (see Special Climate Statement 9). An analysis of rainfall deciles for the 10 years ending November 2006 shows that a number of areas have experienced their driest 10-year period on record, including the area east of Melbourne, around Tumut, and in parts of eastern Tasmania. Virtually all of southeast Australia has experienced its driest 10-year period since at least the 1940s.
Over most of the region, mean annual rainfall since 1996 has been 10-20% below the long-term average, with anomalies exceeding 20% over areas east of Melbourne.
Acute shorter-term rainfall deficits and depleted snow cover in 2006
After near average rainfall during 2005, acute drought conditions began across southeast Australia in January 2006. Over the period from January to November 2006, rainfall has been at or near record low levels over most of the area of interest, both on the mainland and in Tasmania. At some locations in the core of the alpine region, including Cabramurra, Harrietville, Mount Buffalo, and Dartmouth Dam, as well as sites in or near the Melbourne water supply catchments such as O’Shannassy and Marysville, the January-November 2006 rainfall has broken previous records (many set in 1967) by a substantial 80-200 millimetres.
At most mainland locations, January-November 2006 rainfall has been 50-65% below normal. The anomalies have been particularly acute at most of the higher-elevation stations, with Mount Buffalo and Charlotte Pass 66% below normal, and Cabramurra 65% below normal. In the vicinity of St. Marys (Tasmania) January-November rainfall has been generally near 50% below normal. We note that the streamflows across this region have been at record low levels, in many cases far below previously observed lows, indicating the severity of the current drought episode.
For instance, winter inflows to the Murray River system were around 100 GL per month below that of the previously lowest inflows, which occurred in the Federation drought of 1902. (Further details are available from the Murray-Darling Basin Commission website, www.mbdc.gov.au).
Rainfall anomalies have been less extreme on the Gippsland side of the Victorian fire region, although January-November 2006 is still in the driest 10% of years (i.e., decile 1) at most locations, with many areas 35-50% below the 1961-90 average.
Snow cover was also abnormally light throughout south-eastern Australia during winter 2006. Reliable long-term snow cover data are only available from the NSW Snowy Mountains. These data indicate that the peak depth of the 2006 snowpack was the lowest recorded in the 50 years (all records) since records began at the three major Snowy Hydro monitoring sites (Spencers Creek, Deep Creek and Three Mile Dam), although the snow cover during the early part of the season was not as light as it was in 1973 and 1982. Virtually all snow had melted or sublimated by the first week of October, not only indicative of the warm spring, but also suggesting a longer period of exposure for alpine grasses. Whilst no long-term objective data exist for the Victorian snowfields, anecdotal reports indicate that similar snowpack anomalies occurred there. For instance, the ski resort of Mt Baw Baw experienced a maximum natural snow depth of 15 cm during winter.
Exceptionally high mainland temperatures, August-November 2006
After a relatively cool autumn and early winter, daytime maximum temperatures were well above average over most of the south-eastern mainland from August onwards. August-November maximum temperatures were 2-4°C above normal over most mainland fire regions, and were the highest on record over almost all of this region.
The temperatures were particularly exceptional at the high-elevation alpine sites. Mount Buller, Mount Hotham and Cabramurra all set record high mean maximum temperatures for the August-November period by between 1.4 and 1.8°C. Whilst these sites (except for Cabramurra) only have data for relatively short periods, all were operating in 2002 when temperatures at longer-term lowelevation stations were near record levels, and therefore it is likely that the 2006 temperatures are extremely unusual in the context of the last century. The warm temperatures of 2006 are consistent with the long-term warming trend over Australia. In addition the lack of snow cover
during spring 2006 provided a positive feedback to maximum temperatures at the higher-elevation sites.
Abnormal warmth was not such a significant feature of the Tasmanian fire regions. August-November maxima were generally 0 to 1°C above normal and did not approach record levels.
———————-
The text was supported in the original statement by various tables and graphs which have not been reproduced here.
Jennifer Marohasy BSc PhD is a critical thinker with expertise in the scientific method.
Its raining outside now (OK, not a bunch but every little helps) but was interesting is how the warm, moist tropical air is streaming in at this time of year, not like 2005, look at these pics http://www.wxmaps.org/pix/aus.vv.html
Rog
Best wishes for the festive season.
And how interesting that the highest rainfall areas seem to be in regions with zero weather stations (ie oceans near the south pole).
We dumb geologists know all about these spurious artefacts when contouring or gridding anisotropic geospatial data. Called specious anomalies or incomplete modelling!
Wow – Rog has gone all high tech. I’m impressed.
What have I been saying over these past weeks or months even about drought, trees, rivers, soils and fires?
I just need to look out my window to see what’s happening in the environment.
Need a break. Off to the coast again, cheers all
Thye recent drought in areas in southeast Australia and the lower Murray darling basin would seem to indicate the climate change problems are not global but regional. From the mid north coast of NSW to Cape York it has been wetter than usual.
The area of the fires in Victoria has been greatly enlarged – without loss of life and little loss of property – by a distinct change in fire firfighting practice whereby fires are allowed to burn – even encouraged to burn – to achieve fire management objectives.
In Victoria’s case there is considerable pressure for fuel reduction burning folowing the 2003 fires which could not be carried out because of the weather. These lightening and arson lit fires enabled managers to achieve these objectives.
The 2003 regrowth burnt harder and faster than the unburnt bush though – casting doubt on the very notion of fuel reduction burning. Then there is the problem with the impact of the fires on water supplies.
Bob I’ve no idea where you get the idea that the fires in Vic are being allowed to burn to achieve fire management objectives. The fires are burning because the incident mangement teams have no altenatives to control them in their current locations, i.e. their is limited access and the topography & weather combine with this to make it too dangerous to make a stand, witness the decision to withdraw from the country to the east of Dargo and reset at Swifts Creek after the serious injury to a dozer operator. These fires are a serious threat to the ecology of the high country and a long term threat to water quantity and quality. On past history and fire paths they continue to be an ongoing threat to SE NSW. If the NSW scientific committee can list frequent low intensity fire as a threatening process perhaps they need to reconsider their “enlightened” position and include frequent high intensity fire which on current experience is far more likely and far more prevalent.