jennifermarohasy.com/blog - The Politics and Environment Blog

Main menu:

 

November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Tags

Archives

Authors

Site search

Miniposts 0.6.5

Scientist Steve Schneider Flips Fears
On the TV show In Search Of…The Coming Ice Age, Steven Schneider wonders whether mankind should intervene in staving off a coming ice age.  Watch the old footage on YouTube here. (24)

Australian Liberals Oppose Carbon Trading
Australian Opposition Leader (Malcolm Turnbull) will be forced to stare down more than two-thirds of the Liberal back bench if he proceeds with his plan to negotiate with the government over amendments to the emissions trading scheme before December’s Copenhagen climate change conference.   Read more here. (2)

Not Evil Just Wrong
Buy the DVD by clicking on the flashing icon above. (1)

Climate Change Summit in New York
In New York… Chinese leader Hu Jintao … U.S. President Barack Obama more or less shuffled climate control policy off into the great dreamscape of unattainable plans and long range objectives. Like equality for all and peace in our time …  Terence Corcoran, Financial Post (1)

Minerals Industry Now Complaining
THE [Australian] minerals industry has demanded [the Prime Minister] Kevin Rudd overhaul his proposed emissions trading system or risk smashing Australian jobs and the nation’s industrial competitiveness.  Read more here. (1)

Advertisement

Links

Disclaimer: The inclusion of a blog or website in this list should not be taken as an endorsement of its contents by me.

Sydney Morning Herald Open to Letters from Skeptics

Some time ago Art Raiche suggested to me that, “In all honesty, I suspect that it would be easier to hold readings of Dawkin’s “The God Delusion” in Mecca than to get the Sydney Morning Herald to print letters critical of AGW.  At least the response would be more direct.”

Today, the Sydney Morning Herald Letters Editor wrote:

“CLIMATE change is always a problematic issue for the letters page, and Michael Duffy’s opinion piece last Saturday sparked vigorous exchanges all week. Readers on both sides hold views with something approaching religious fervour, while grounding their arguments in science. If we publish the views of sceptics, we are accused of airing theories with as little credibility as creationism. If we don’t, we are accused of censorship and taking sides.

“It seems to me much better to have all kinds of opinions in the open – the letters page is not a peer-reviewed journal, and even if it was that would not necessarily give it authority in this debate. All we can do is plead for politeness, brevity and a bit of nuance…”   Mike Ticher Letters editor

I am impressed!  Thanks Mr Ticher.

Advertisement

One Response to “Sydney Morning Herald Open to Letters from Skeptics”

  1. Comment from: Ron Pike


    What a self serving load of tripe from Mr. Ticher.
    Why, Mr Ticher, is Climate Change any more of a “problematic issue” than other contentious issues?
    You fly your true colours, Mr. Ticher, when you say that to print the views of sceptics is to be; “accused of airing theories with as little credibility as creationism.” without recognising the sensationalist scaremongering of the IPCC and its deciples.
    Accused by whom, Mr. Ticher? Others at Fairfax, perhaps!
    As politely as I can, I have to say that the SMH has an increasingly sceptical readership who are deeply concerned at the symbiotic relationship that has verdantly developed between some journalists and environmentalists.
    This agressive mistletoe of controled and supressed and often totally false information is slowly destroying the once proud reputation of your Masthead.
    Truth and balance has been sadly lacking in the SMH for too long.
    Pikey.

Leave a Reply