Insert that word – Ivermectin – even once into a Facebook post and you risk being cancelled, especially if you combine it with the word vaccination. There was a warning the first time I did it, but more recently everything just disappeared. Well, it seems that way when I couldn’t find the post: not anywhere. Not even the photograph of Patrick!
I remember when my friend Craig Kelly was cancelled, well more than cancelled, he was eventually properly scrubbed from that social media platform.
The more Craig drew directly from published peer-reviewed studies for his Facebook posts, to ask why Ivermectin was not being promoted here in Australia as a prophylaxis against Covid-19, the more he upset the Facebook gatekeepers.
The gatekeepers claimed it was about ‘community standards’.
No. It was about censorship – and power.
Interestingly, new social media platform Truth Social (aka TrumpBook), is trending as the number one download from the Apple apps store right now. I hope to be your friend there one day soon, though I’m so far yet to find the time to click across and download that app.
Meanwhile in the real world, those who rule over us have decided that we are all to be vaccinated against Covid-19, not just once but for as long as it takes. They don’t want us to even consider that there could be alternatives, like Ivermectin.
Australia’s Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly keeps repeating that there are no studies with Ivermectin that have shown it to be effective – yet they keep getting published! There was a summary by Jo Nova last September, and more recently a review of Ivermectin trials published in the American Journal of Therapeutics (volume 28, pages 434 – 460). This review concludes that given the evidence of efficacy, safety, low cost, and current death rates, Ivermectin is likely to have a positive impact on health and economic outcomes of the pandemic across many countries. The same review article explains that Ivermectin is not a new and experimental drug with an unknown safety profile. It is a WHO ‘Essential Medicine’ already used successfully to treat other diseases and very safe at correct doses. The review article also states: ‘Ivermectin is likely to be an equitable, acceptable, and feasible global intervention against COVID-19. Health professionals should strongly consider its use, in both treatment and prophylaxis.’
Yet the Australian government has banned my new doctor from prescribing Ivermectin for use as either a prophylaxis or treatment against Covid.
My Facebook post the day before yesterday seemed innocent enough, and was inspired by a list of studies, not on Ivermectin, but on the side effects of the Pfizer vaccine against Covid-19. I wrote:
When it came to considering getting vaccinated against Covid in August last year, I didn’t go to my usual doctor. I knew she would just arrange for me to be injected with whatever was on offer. It is not that she is a bad doctor, but rather that she has a tendency to uncritically go along with the consensus on most things. Like most people.
I went to the doctor that my friend Patrick had found, a doctor who at that time was prepared to write a script for Ivermectin. That was before it was banned by the TGA.
Anyway, this new doctor (young, foreign-trained) was quite specific in his advice to me. He was against the Covid-19 Pfizer vaccine because he was aware of a growing list of adverse reactions particularly the issue of myocarditis. He acknowledged there are always risks, but he said to me quite bluntly that myocarditis is particularly difficult to manage should you be unlucky enough to get it as a side effect of the vaccine. He said this was not a risk should I be vaccinated with AstraZeneca.
I am perplexed by the number of my Facebook friends who in the public threads, or by messenger, or even to me by email insist that myocarditis is something that is ‘easily’ managed. As though it is something like the seasonal flu, even the variant of Covid-19 that went through Noosa a month or so ago, something you get over in a few days.
Anyway, a new friend Bud Bromley has put together a list of peer-reviewed medical papers submitted to various medical journals evidencing a multitude of adverse events in covid-19 vaccine recipients. And he begins with Myocarditis and comment that it is: An inflammation of the heart muscle (myocardium). The inflammation can reduce the heart’s ability to pump and cause rapid or irregular heart rhythms (arrhythmias). Signs and symptoms of myocarditis include chest pain, fatigue, shortness of breath, and rapid or irregular heartbeats. In a small percentage of cases persons with myocarditis can be at risk of sudden death following strenuous activity. Some sufferers of myocarditis may require heart surgery or a heart transplant later in life.
The list is here:
When I started to work my way through some of the published papers in Bud Bromley’s list, I was reminded of what was originally promised by the vaccines.
The first paper on his list reminded me that the Pfizer vaccine was meant to provide 94–95% efficacy in prevention of severe Covid-19. There is no mention that this efficacy lasted but a few months.
The second paper reminded me that none of the clinical trials reported myocarditis as a side effect. It is now recognised as a real issue, particularly for fit young boys and men who play sport.
Covid-19 has proven to be a problem for certain demographics: the obese, the elderly, those with comorbidities. And it comes in waves. It is not likely to be an issue for healthy children – in fact, most of us are not at risk of severe Covid-19.
I am not against vaccines, but I am against the Covid-19 vaccines because the risk to reward ratio doesn’t seem to stack-up anymore. Not for children anyway. And what is more important than the health of our children.
Gatekeeping is a process by which information is filtered to the public by the media and increasingly by social media platforms. With the legacy media it was editors who choose which stories would reach people every day. With Facebook it seems to be more a case of deleting rather than necessarily promoting, though the result may be the same. We never come to understand the alternatives.
The image at the very top of this blog post is of my friend Patrick at Granite Bay in Noosa National Park a couple of years ago. I thought it as good a photograph as any to post – with the quick note that I penned for Facebook two days ago. And I included it as an acknowledgment, that there are some people to whom I owe a debit of gratitude for past efforts to make alternatives like Ivermectin a reality for me.
It was August 2021, there was talk about a vaccine mandate and Craig Kelly had just resigned from the Liberal Party because of all the anguish around him promoting Ivermectin. I said to him please don’t resign you are better staying within the Liberal Party, he said that he couldn’t if he wanted to keep researching and reporting on Ivermectin.
Back then, Patrick phoned-about to find out where we could legally source Ivermectin. He ended-up on the phone to Robert Clancy from Newcastle University. The professor told Patrick that first he needed to get Thomas Borody’s Triple Therapy Protocol and get this to a compounding pharmacy.
As it turned out the compounding chemist told Patrick to get his doctor to call them – they couldn’t legally give Patrick the protocol, not directly.
Neither of us knew a doctor who wanted to get involved in all of this, not back then.
Patrick went to some trouble to find a doctor on the Sunshine Coast who would both:
- Get the protocol, and
- Prescribe it.
Patrick was not deterred when most of the doctor’s clinics he phoned cautioned him against Ivermectin – while being unable to justify their position. They were against it because they had heard it didn’t work against Covid. That remains the myth here in Australia: a widely held but false belief or idea.
They had heard it was for horses and sheep, as though we don’t also use antibiotics against a variety of diseases affecting horses and sheep – and also us.
The Triple Therapy that works best against Covid includes an antibiotic and also zinc as well as Ivermectin.
As Jo Nova explains in a more recent blog post, as early as July 2020 El Salvador was trialling kits to treat Covid that included Ivermectin. Cases were starting to rise, so on August 9, 2020 the President Nayib Bukele made a national announcement that treatment kits and tests were available. Anyone with symptoms could call up the helpline and a box would be delivered to their home. The treatment kits included ivermectin, azithromycin, zinc, Vitamin D, Panadol, and an antihistamine.
It stopped that wave of Covid-19 dead: numbers of people being infected plummeted.
By January 2021 cases were on the rise again and so Ivermectin was made available over the counter without a prescription for anyone to buy at pharmacies – in El Salvador.
Ivermectin, Ivermectin, Ivermectin.
Remind me, why is it banned here in Australia?
There is a lot at stake in all of this: access to safe medicines – and the right to choose given our age and health and the levels of Covid in the community which will change with time.
Some 24 hours after Facebook took down my post it sent me advice suggesting that my words, and the picture of Patrick, were spam. What misinformation! Ivermectin Ivermectin Ivermectin.
UPDATE
I have not contacted Facebook to dispute the claims, nor did I post anything more about Ivermectin or the vaccine mandates. However, since late Thursday 24th I’ve been banned from Facebook for five (5) days. I’m planning to move my social media activities perhaps to Twitter and also Substack. I’ve just opened a Substack account, jennifermarohasy.substack.com at Twitter I’m JennMarohasy
Jennifer Marohasy BSc PhD is a critical thinker with expertise in the scientific method.
My wife and I have purchased Ivermectin from the US, Happy Family Med Store.
It also goes under the name Stromectol.
We purchased 40, 12mg tablets. Came in a plain envelope – along with 4 bonus Viagra tablets.
If we get Covid we would take Ivermectin, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Vitamin K2 and Zinc – plus fresh air.
https://happyfamilymedstore.com/stromectol
Thank you once again Jennifer. With authorities mandating potentially dangerous vaccinations while preventing ivermectin, a proven safe and effective medication (when given under medical supervision), from being used as a treatment we know some terrible agendas are at play.
We can only hope the full story will come out and those responsible will be dealt with accordingly. I fear this may be some time off but there must be a reckoning.
IF and that is a big IF Morrison is returned one of his priorities must be to rein in these politically motivate social media companies. This and the forcing of Their ABC to stick to its charter are essential for our democracy to survive. When people who hold opposing views can be summarily cancelled or removed this is not democracy it is authoritarianism.
LinkedIn will ban you permanently if you write about Ivermectin or adverse effects of the covid shots on LinkedIn. I was banned twice. After I was banned, a friend who is an M.D. posted the list of 388 peer reviewed papers on LinkedIn and LinkedIn banned him also.
Aloha!
A personal note to illustrate the sheer stupidity of ‘it’ all:
My 50-ish neighbour down the road, lives in a large household with his wife and two daughters, one of whom is married, with a husband and young child, the other is single. Last Saturday, the unattached came home with ‘it’, and shared ‘it’ around, so the whole household came down with ‘it’; they were all vaccinated (and boosted to boot), but he is the only unjabbed occupant.
Good news: both he and I have provisioned ourselves with all the good stuff under the various protocols that use cheap therapeutic drugs and vitamin supplements to overcome ‘it’ should dare enter the front door of our abodes. His update this morning: ‘it’ is almost gone. (Key ingredients of our kits: IVM, HCQ, doxycycline, Vit D & C, zinc, and quercetin, with an all-purpose nasal spray).
However, like me, he has no intention of being jabbed with stuff that a) might well do you harm, and b) does not do what it was required to do under the Emergency Use Authorization, viz. immunize one from being infected by ‘it’. Here’s the words for the Moderna goo (Pfizer’s is similar), which might suggest an action for misleading and deceptive practice at best, or outright fraud at worst, given that the makers were well aware of the ineffectiveness very early in their trials.
“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued an Emergency Use
Authorization (EUA) to permit the emergency use of the unapproved product, MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE, for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 18 years of age and older.”
Jennifer,
I often mention Ivermectin and vaccination in discussion groups and am so far unscathed.
Maybe because I also post studies into Ivermectin that don’t show any properties that are more efficacious than standard treatments which have improved out of sight.
Maybe its the engineer in me but I have always looked at all sides of a problem before jumping in boots and all
I have checked out Bud’s list and have already read quite a few of them.
Many say Ivermectin is promising and urge further studies.
I also note that Brophy’s treatment includes an anti-biotic.
As current medical thinking is to limit the over use of anti-biotics wherever possible I personally try to avoid them wherever I can.
Harking back to Craig Kelly, he started his campaign against wide spread Covid 19 vaccinations as an HCQ devotee, (now seemingly forgotten).
When some on his page started pointing out that there were several other treatments showing promise like … Ivermectin he went full bore on recommending it – a pharmaceutical that has little acceptance (yet) around the developed world’s health authorities.
I’m hanging out for the results of the University of Oxford’s Principle trial in the UK.
It will be large,(many thousands of volunteers), randomised, double blind and placebo controlled ie gold standard.
BTW – why the faith in “peer review” ?
It only means that the researchers have mates with the same qualifications and same view who have endorsed the trial as correctly conducted.
Just the same as the vast array of Climate Science studies.
Funny how ivermectin which has better safety profile than paracetamol is shut down due to a supposed lack of trials, while unapproved and never before used on humans mRNA technology with no long term safety data that doesn’t prevent transmission or infection is mandated. For Dave Ross, perhaps some more due diligence is in order, while doxycycline is part of Dr Borody’s triple therapy, it’s because of it’s anti inflammatory properties and not because it’s an antibiotic.
Facebook is probably the largest personal data-minig operation in history.
Avoid it like Kovid..
I suspect most of the other “social media” sites are also playing that game.
Dearie me Patrick,
What it is used for is a secondary matter.
It remains an anti-biotic -it doesn’t change its nature or its side effects on gut health etc.
Have you looked for any Ivermectin/Covid studies that find Ivermectin no more efficacious than standard treatment with a whole range of drugs that suit the patient’s medical profile, and physiology.
Not just the ones that provide confiramation bias ?
I will be tickled pink if yet another drug,(there are several, also cheap),with an excellent safety profile like Ivermectin, (at a safe dosage) meets the stringent standards required for TGA approval for Covid 19 treatment.
The key manufacturer of Ivermectin (Merck)does not recommend it for Covid 19 treatment and has printed that advice.
BTW Borody and Clancy have not derided the Covid 19 vaccines and suggest that Ivermectin should be used as an adjunct to vaccination, not instead of.
Which the new anti-virals already in manufacture will be used for.
If you could provide me with a clinical study, utilising a large cohort, (thousands) of volunteers, that is randomised, double blind and placebo controlled that shows Ivermectin efficacious as a prophylactic and/or for treatment of Covid 1, I would be most grateful.
I read both sides of the coin – I am not blinkered or obsessed and have access to excellent scientific advice from highly qualified medical scientists who just happen to be old friends.
A bit higher qualified to judge than you or me old son – and Jennifer too for that matter
Thanking you in advance.
Dave.
Jennifer, surely it’s time to also discuss how Vitamin D3 is in boosting the immune system and thus preventing infection.
After all Vitamin D3 is available at chemists & supplement stores.. And can be ordered in higher concentrations ia the internet.
Also I’ve come to the conclusion that the current vaccines are not the full ‘Monty”
!!
They do reduce severity of the disease & so reduce the probability of dying.
But the current vaccines fo not prevent infection. Nor do they prevent a vaccinated & infected person infecting other people.
In the old Australian phrase they are ‘pups’ ! Not properly effective vaccines.
After 2 years surely it’s time that properly effective vaccines were developed which prevent infection and do not have adverse side effects.
Dave Ross
The point is that you could swap out doxy for another anti inflammatory if you had bothered to understand how the triple therapy works. Like I said you obviously haven’t done your due diligence. And where are the randomized, double blind and placebo controlled studies for the vaccine that you were only happy to be injected with 3 times?
As for any qualifications you may have, it just seems to me that you must be educated well beyond your intelligence.
Thanking you in advance.
Patrick.
FB allows us to block mercenary spies that report to them.
“Fact checker” and “political fact checker” are capable of allowing the block. Go to ‘settings’ and then ‘blocking’ and then type in those. I found nearly 30 so far in the two weeks since I was made aware.
I said “Americans were stupid” …. so these scum seem American and sensitive. Got restricted for 24 hrs.
On a whim I also checked “facebook security”. I exposed Aceh, which I expect is the reason I found 25 or so Indonesian entities. All apparently now blocked.
Patrick,
So can’t find a comprehensive gold standard, Ivermectin clinical trial ?
Not surprised -I can’t either.
Answering a request with another about another medication doesn’t really address the subject – bit weak.
Dexamethasone is also being used as an anti-inflammatory in Covid treatment – cheap and effective – maybe Borody would use it.
I have his triple therapy in my Covid file and he seems pretty keen on Doxy.
You want a randomized, double blind and placebo controlled studies for the vaccine that I was happy to be injected with 3 times?
Well actually I had a double AZ viral vector vaccine as recommended, same as Jennifer ?
And a Pfizer booster – as recommended.
So to a gold standard clinical trial as requested.
An extract from the link below.
“an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose).
If you read the detail you will also be able to identify the C4591001 clinical trial group which was represented by many reputable researchers and laboratories.
Its all their -you just have to know how to look.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577
Patrick,
Just in case you find the study heavy going, this was a large study over about 8 months.
And it entailed;
“A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. ”
Cheers.
Dave, looks like I know as much about vaccine studies as you do about ivermectin. Although the claimed 95% efficacy is a complete joke now. Thanks for the laugh.
Cheers
The case for the use of ivermectin to prevent (and treat) those infected with SARS-CoV-2 is without any doubt:
That billionaire buffoon Bill Gates has been openly showing his dismay and sorrow because Omicron has ruined the vaccines in their tracks. He lamented that it took the vaccine manufacturers too long to launch their Covid-19 vaccines, and that by the time that some parts of the world were still on the second shot, or even the first shot, and the rest on the booster, Omicron came, and within a couple of months this benign variant had vaccinated the whole world.
The vaccine emperor, proving more and more what a buffoon he is, then continued on his lamentation saying that another pandemic is on the way. How does he know? Has he got the new virus ready to be launched? I’m stocking up on Ivermectin and HCQ.
One last thing. Ivermectin works on ALL corona viruses, including the common cold and influenza viruses. If our doctors had to prescribe it against the annual flu visitations, Pfizer and the vaccine cabal will go the way of the Dodo. That is the main reason why they launched a war on Ivermectin. It’s their kryptonite.
I’m just filing this here:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/cdc-says-some-people-should-wait-longer-for-second-covid-19-shot-due-to-heart-inflammation-risk_4297186.html?utm_source=CCPVirusNewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2022-02-24
“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has officially altered its recommended COVID-19 vaccination schedule in a bid to address concerns about the elevated rate of heart inflammation seen among many groups who have gotten a vaccine.
The two most widely administered COVID-19 vaccines in the country are made by Moderna and Pfizer. Recipients are advised to get a two-dose primary series of each.
Before the new update, people were told to get a second Pfizer shot 21 days after the first, or a second Moderna shot 28 days after the first.
The new guidance says people can wait as long as eight weeks between the first and second jabs.
Lengthening the interval is a response to the higher-than-expected rates of myocarditis and pericarditis, two types of heart inflammation, found among men under 40 and some females after they’d gotten a second dose of the Pfizer or Moderna jabs.
“While absolute risk remains small, the relative risk for myocarditis is higher for males ages 12-39 years, and this risk might be reduced by extending the interval between the first and second dose,” the CDC says on its website.
Myocarditis alone after Moderna’s second dose was reported at a rate of 68 per million and after Pfizer’s second dose at a rate of about 47 per million in males 18 to 39, according to a government analysis of data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, a surveillance system. Several studies have pegged the risk in some groups of myocarditis following vaccination as higher than from COVID-19 itself, leading some experts to call for a partial pause of at least Moderna’s vaccine, if not Pfizer’s as well, but U.S. officials have not heeded those calls.
The CDC says it’s verified no post-vaccination deaths caused by myocarditis, but autopsies of two young men performed by state experts two young men said the vaccines appeared to lead to their deaths.
Some studies indicate that the risk may be reduced by extending the intervals, and Canada and other countries changed the recommended intervals months ago.
“The longer interval resulted in lower myocarditis rates, whereas the shorter interval had higher myocarditis and pericarditis rates,” Dr. Bryna Warshawsky of the Public Health Agency of Canada told a CDC vaccine advisory panel in a recent meeting.
End quote.
Patrick,
For some strange reason you think I haven’t accumulated knowledge about Ivermectin.
I keep a large file on Covid 19 and its little mate SARS-CoV-2.
As you are obviously a devotee of Ivermectin you will probably be interested toknow that there is another large gold standard study underway with an expected 15,000 volunteers into repurposed existing pharmaceuticals – Activ-6.
Drug: Ivermectin
Drug: Fluvoxamine
Drug: Fluticasone
Other: Placebo
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04885530
February 21, 2022
Here is a typical study, of which there are many, into utilising Ivermectin in the first 5 days of infection which represents the viral replication phase of 5 – 7 days.
This of course is not Borody’s triple therapy but negates the popular belief that the “wonder drug” Ivermectin can go it alone.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2789362
A terrific comment on this study by Binh Ngo.
The Time to Treat the Viral Replication Phase of Covid-19
Binh Ngo, M.D. | Keck USC School of Medicine
COVID-19 is a multiphasic disease, with the phase of viral replication ending typically in 5-7 days (1). One would not expect significant benefit from an antiviral medication at the later immune mediated hyperinflammatory phase which leads to pulmonary and systemic deterioration in up to 20% of victims. The antiviral treatments which have been successful have typically been administered no later than 5 days from initial symptoms: (a) the monoclonal SARS-cov-2 neutralizing antibodies (i) sotrovimab up to 5 days with 58% of the patients at 3 days or less (2) (ii) LY-CoV555 4 days from symptom onset (3) (iii) The Regeneron cocktail 3 days (4) (b) molnupiravir at no more than 5 days (5) (c) nirmatrelvir at 3 days (6). The large randomized clinical trials of ivermectin are ACTIV-6 which allows up to 7 days of symptoms (7) and the British PRINCIPLE trial which enrolls patients at up to 14 days of symptoms (8). For an analysis of the effectiveness of an antiviral medication, it is important to have sufficient patients to compare those with early disease to those later in the course of COVID-19.
Cheers
It seems the largest actual outcome of real consequences is mostly ignored by those who insist on ‘studies’ as being the only precursor to prove the positive benefit of the cheap drug.
Well, I wonder what those 200,000,000 and more real people in Uttar Pradesh would say to those doubters after weathering the angst of ‘it’ by using IVM when compared to millions in adjacent states who weren’t given free access like they were?
And, then there are the millions of our dark skinned brethren who have largely avoided ‘it’ simply by popping a pill (HCQ/IVM) once a week to resist those infernal jabs from those pesky insects that don’t seem to have any other purpose than to spread malaria throughout tropical Africa.
Alex, your thoughts are mine too.
I wonder when Jennifer will start a Substack account; it’ll be easier to ‘talk’ to each other.
Dave,
Funny how you post a single negative study from Binh Ngo and ignore the 68 studies that are linked to in the beginning of this blog post and if you follow that link you’ll find a meta analysis of 78 studies -> https://ivmmeta.com/
Next you quote Binh Ngo, talking about an antiviral being of no use in the hyperinflammatory phase, yet 2 posts before you were banging on about not wanting to take doxycycline because it’s an antibiotic?
As I stated above doxycycline’s role in the triple therapy is an antiinflammatory!
I also don’t know where you got the idea that ivermectin is a go it alone drug. Borody himself said there is no point in taking just ivermectin.
However, early last year the chairman of the Tokyo medical association pointed out that in African countries where ivermectin was being used to prevent river blindness, (just one dose per year), there were 134.4 covid cases per 100 000 and 2.2 covid deaths per 100 000 vs African countries that don’t use ivermectin where they recorded 950.6 cases per 100 000 and 29.3 deaths per 100 000.
Maybe it’s time to update your large file on Covid 19 and its little mate SARS-CoV-2.
. . . and book your booster.
Patrick,
Maybe read my texts little more carefully.
I am discussing – not against or for Ivermectin and providing studies not opinions.
I wish more would do the same instead of just posting confirmation bias.
Although you still haven’t provided any study at all.
I only included the Binh Ngo comment, (which is not a study) as a terrific explanation of why anti-viral drugs are only of use doing the 5 – 7 days of early infection which is when viral replication occurs – which is what Borody recommends – early treatment for that same reason.
I was not banging on about not wanting to take doxy, just pointing out current scientific concern about over use of anti-biotics in general.
These are topics I am raising.
My “go it alone comment” was, in reference to “popular belief”.
As Borody has carefully pointed out, Ivermectin has to be taken in concert with doxy and zinc … early in the infection when viral replication is occurring.
And I am also showing there are other anti-virals other than Ivermectin, that show promise and standard treatment with several drugs other than Ivermectin have also had success.
There is no, one size fits all, magic drug or combination thereof that suits all patients, of all ages and racial groups that has been proven so.
When you reference stats for different countries you need to examine all aspects of that particular data.
Claiming, as many do, that HCQ and/or Ivermectin were in use at the same time as strict lockdowns, isolation measures, mask wearing, vaccination and the wave of infections naturally ending, and claiming therefore it must have been the HCQ/Ivermectin that caused a drop in deaths or infections is obviously just bias.
HCQ and Ivermectin may very well have been a significant factor but the other factors involved muddy the waters – stats need to be studied carefully as there is much to consider.
And prophylaxis for Covid, other than vaccines is another entirely different subject.
Chin chin.
I used an Indian company to get my 100, 12mg Ivermectin tablets, & Zilverdo KITs, the kit given to all covid close contact people in the Indian province of Uttar Pradesh, which knocked the virus out of the 240 million inhabitants.
Got it from,
Shubhangi Kamdi
D/O Suryabhan Vaidya, Juna Bagadganj Road
Khumbahr Toli
Nagpur, MAHARASHTRA 440008
shubhangikamdi999@gmail.com.
Worth a try if you like living.
Hi Dave Ross,
Among those large files of studies can you please lead us to the study of thousands of people where the dreaded virus itself was isolated and proven to make people sick.
The CDC said they “contrived” it, Moderna patented parts of it, (before it was found), several Govt agencies around the world have admitted they have no proof it exists.
Dr Reiner Fullmich has assembled vast amounts of proof, not only that it has never been isolated, but also that some prominent business people and politicians not only know this, but have profited vastly.
There is absolutely no doubt that the PCR tests found “anything they wanted”, to paraphrase Kary Mullis the inventor of the PCR process and that CDC and others stated this.
A German institute which advises their Govt found that the RAT’s averaged 92% useless and one Chinese made one 100% useless. The Govt, of course took no notice, but what do you expect from a bunch of Green US puppets, who are about to, seriously, shut all industry down, to save the planet from gas.
Back door way, by closing all nuke plants, then cutting Russia off SWIFT. (1/3 of their energy usage).
My experience with moderna:
I’m 85, slightly obese, with asthma, hypertrophiccardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, and 24/7 Afib. Ten days after my 2nd Moderna vax, I was admitted to a hospital cardiac ICU with Bradycardia. My pulse was 30bpm and I could barely walk across the room. Even though I’d had full-time Afib for about five years, I’d never had Bradycardia before. Needless to say, I’m not taking any boosters.