1. Coldest Temperature Stations shut down in old Soviet Union caused artificial rise in global average temp
Excerpt: With data provided by Ross McKitrick the number of temperature stations around the world dropped by about 7000 in the 1989-1990 time frame. Thousands of these were in the Soviet Union at the time when that nation was going through major upheaval and economic collapse. With much bigger problems, these temperature stations were shut down. Now try to imagine the problem in calculating an average global average temperature when thousands of the coldest stations are shut down? An average temperature using the remaining stations showed an increase in global temperature of about 1 degree C. This is called a major data quality problem.
http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?260c3ffc-6af0-40f6-b4c1-0afb46987770
2. Metallica lead singer disses LIVE EARTH: ‘I didn’t quite agree with what was going on there’
Excerpt: James Hetfield “Our philosophy is ‘think for yourself’ at the end of the day — do what you think feels right. I really believe that humans will survive. I have a lot of faith in mankind that we will overcome and adapt — whatever it is; whether it’s man-made or God-made, or Earth/Mother Nature — we have a lot of smart people on this planet that will make something good out of bad.”
http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/07/metallica_the_v.php
METALLICA’s ‘Live Earth’ Appearance Translates Into Record Sales
http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=76943
3. America’s gas price survey maven mocks climate fears as ‘unfriendly brainwashing’
Excerpt: I think that there has been friendly as well as unfriendly brainwashing taking place. And when I say friendly and unfriendly, I’m talking about decades of extremist views that have now achieved mainstream acceptance. And the No. 1 item among those affecting current oil politics in Washington is the boogeyman, also known as global warming.
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/07/10/fa.lundberg.qa/
4. Eating beef found to be more harmful to Earth than driving
Excerpt: Producing 2.2lb of beef generates as much greenhouse gas as driving a car
non-stop for three hours, it was claimed yesterday.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/07/19/nbeef119.xml
5. Bees disappearance solved? Scientist says Asian parasite is killing Western bees
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/43163/story.htm
6. Bees Dying: Is It a Crisis or a Phase?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/17/science/17bees.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
7. Russia plans big nuclear expansion
Excerpt: Leading the globe in construction of new plants, it also hopes to export as many as 60 plants in the next two decades.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0717/p01s04-woeu.html
8. Vandals slash tires and scratch eco note on DC man’s Hummer & Prius driving neighbors seem to approve
Excerpt: Now, as Groves ponders what to do with the remains of his $38,000 SUV, he has been the target of a number of people who have driven by the crime scene in his upscale neighborhood and glared at him in smug satisfaction. “I’d say one in five people who come by have that ‘you-got-what-you-deserve’ look,” said his friend Andy Sexton, 27, who is visiting from Arkansas and has been helping Groves deal with fallout from the crime. < > “They’ve got everything at their disposal in this city to make a statement in a legal way,” Fremaux said of the bat-wielding men who struck out at the Hummer. “I consider this a hate crime.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/17/AR2007071701808.html
9. Flashback: Prius Outdoes Hummer in Environmental Damage (March 7, 2007 – THE RECORDER – Central Connecticut State University)
Excerpt: Building a Toyota Prius causes more environmental damage than a Hummer that is on the road for three times longer than a Prius. As already noted, the Prius is partly driven by a battery which contains nickel. The nickel is mined and smelted at a plant in Sudbury, Ontario. This plant has caused so much environmental damage to the surrounding environment that NASA has used the dead zone around the plant to test moon rovers. The area around the plant is devoid of any life for miles.
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=14304 &
http://clubs.ccsu.edu/recorder/editorial/editorial_item.asp?NewsID=188
10. Australian city sees coldest day on record
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/articles/2007/07/19/1184559902397.html
11. Live Earth – Dead Africans?
Policies that prevent energy development have lethal consequences for Africa
http://www.webcommentary.com/asp/ShowArticle.asp?id=driessenp&date=070719
12. Effort to Curb Climate Change May Hurt African Farms
Excerpt: A bid to slow global warming by reducing the tonnes of food air freighted around the world ran up on Tuesday against the worries of poor African growers who fear it will hurt their business. <> “The repercussions will certainly be bad. This ban will only serve as an incentive to kill all environmentally friendly agriculture in Kenya,” Stephen Mbithi, Chief Executive of Fresh Produce Exporters Association of Kenya, told Reuters.
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/43143/story.htm
13. Organic food air freighted should be stripped of organic status roundup
Excerpt: Food imported into Britain by air is an “absolute catastrophe” and should be stripped of any right to organic status, campaigners have claimed.Greenpeace and leading figures in the organic industry called on the Government to take action against “air freight”, which they claim undermines the whole ethos of wholesome, sustainable agriculture.But opponents pointed out that a ban would unfairly penalise poor farmers in developing countries and fail to make a meaningful impact on the problem of greenhouse gas emissions.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/07/17/eamiles117.xml
14. Briton swims at North Pole to show effects of global warming
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070715211336.h2lllk66&show_article=1&image=large
Meteorologist raises questions about truthfulness of arctic swimmer (James Craig of Wood TV in Michigan)
Excerpt: This man was in the water for almost 19 minutes wearing nothing but a speedo! Is that possible? Does the first picture look like a man who has just spent this much time in subfreezing water? http://blogs.woodtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/screenshot_012.jpgAnd take a look at the next picture. http://blogs.woodtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/screenshot_011.jpgI have never been to the North Pole but is it possible to see the curve of the horizon there? Doesn’t this picture look faked? Perhaps there is a camera lense that would produce this effect.
http://blogs.woodtv.com/?p=2284
Flashback: Scientists say open water at the North Pole isn’t unusual
Excerpt: According to Rothrock and other scientists who study the Arctic, open water at the pole is a common occurrence. ROTHROCK: “There’s a lot of open water, a lot of crack of this size they describe in the sea ice in the summer. So in and of itself, that doesn’t seem so bizarre. I think they played it up as something a little bigger than it actually was. It seemed to me that mostly, it was a disappointment to the people who wanted to step out and say they stood on the North Pole.” In fact, at any given time during the summer, 10 to 15 percent of the Arctic Ocean is not covered by ice, says Dr. Mark Johnson, a physical oceanographer at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Johnson spends a great deal of time modeling the ever-changing dynamics of the ice cap. He says the six-mile-long opening in the ice—called a lead—that tourists saw, sounds about right for this time of year.
http://seagrant.uaf.edu/news/00ASJ/08.30.00_MeltingIcecap.html
15. An Interview With Nigel Calder, former editor of New Scientist and co-author with Physicist Henrik Svensmark of a new 2007 book entitled “The Chilling Stars: A New Theory of Climate Change”
Excerpt: Q: How do you respond to the paper by Lockwood and Froehlich, which claims to comprehensively ‘settle the debate’ on the cosmic ray hypothesis (& Solar-climate link) you describe in The Chilling Stars? NC: How often we’ve heard it before, that the debate has been settled! But this is an interesting case because these scientists accept that the Sun has played a big part in climate change over hundreds and thousands of years, just as we explain in the book. They even allow that it was involved in the warming in much of the 20th Century. And when Lockwood and Froehlich go on to say that the intensification of solar activity seen in the past hundred years has now ended, we don’t disagree with that. We part company only when they say that temperatures have gone on shooting up, so that the recent rise can’t have anything to do with the Sun, or with cosmic rays modulated by the Sun. In reality global temperatures have stopped rising. Data for both the surface and the lower air show no warming since 1999. That makes no sense by the hypothesis of global warming driven mainly by CO2, because the amount of CO2 in the air has gone on increasing. But the fact that the Sun is beginning to neglect its climatic duty — of batting away the cosmic rays that come from ‘the chilling stars’ — fits beautifully with this apparent end of global warming.
http://www.londonbookreview.com/interviews/nigelcalder.html
16. What global warming, Australian skeptic asks (Paleoclimate scientist Bob Carter)
Excerpt: Carter: “The accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998. Oddly, this eight-year-long temperature stasis has occurred despite an increase over the same period of 15 parts per million (or 4%) in atmospheric carbon dioxide. “Second, lower-atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements, if corrected for non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, show little, if any, global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17%).”
17. When Physics Trumps Hysteria in Global Warming
The climate forces which have led to the estimated 0.6C degree temperature increase over the past 100 years or more (according to the International Panel on Climate Change) have been assumed to be man-made CO2 emissions from advanced nations including the U.S. We know this can’t be true for several reasons. The first is that water vapor provides 95 percent of the total of the greenhouse gases, not CO2. The total of the CO2 represents less than 3 percent of the total. The second is that of the total atmospheric CO2 inventory, the manmade fraction is less than 3 percent of the CO2 total and therefore far less than 1 percent of the total greenhouse gas inventories. Third, studies of the recent climate variations are finding, for example, (See article by J. Oestermans, Science, p. 375, April 29, 2005) that glaciers have been receding since 1750 or so, well before any significant man-made CO2 emissions occurred. The mid 1700s were at the very depths of the Little Ice Age, which we have learned was the coldest climate over the last 5000 years. Obviously, other warming forces were at work before humans had anything to do with it.
http://www.grassrootinstitute.org/GrassrootPerspective/PhysicsTrumps.shtml
18. MAYOR SAYS NJ GOVERNOR, SIERRA CLUB ARE HYPOCRITICAL ON GLOBAL WARMING
Excerpt: Cassella, whose town encompasses the state-owned meadowlands property that is the future home of the massive Xanadu mega-mall project and the new Giants-Jets stadium – said the state is being hypocritical when it is pushing a global warming initiative on state utility companies and private corporations while ignoring the greenhouse gases created by the projects it controls.
“Just a few yards from where Gov. Corzine, Al. Gore and New Jersey Sierra Club President Jeff Tittel were holding their photo-op and proclaiming their concern for the global environment is the site of two of the biggest, energy wasting projects in the state,” said Cassella.
http://www.politicsnj.com/mayor-says-corzine-sierra-club-are-hypocritical-global-warming-10344
19. Meteorologist Anthony Watts finds more questionable temperature sensors
Excerpt: I just didn’t think it possible NOAA would allow a consumer grade sensor in the USHCN dataset.
http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1817
20. Meteorologist debunks notion of a ‘consensus’ on global warming (James Craig of Wood TV in Michigan)
Excerpt: “International surveys of climate scientists [were] conducted in 1996 and again in 2003 by two German environmental scientists. More than 530 climate scientists from 27 different countries provided answers for the surveys. The surveys were password protected to ensure that scientists in climate related fields were the only ones with access. The Heartland Institute’s booklet is entitled Scientific Consensus on Global Warming (PDF) and gives the following summary of the 2003 survey: The 2003 survey results show climate scientists at laboratories, universities, and offices around the world nearly all agree that global warming is underway and the media influences the public’s perception of climate change. On all other questions, there was significant disagreement. Specifically, there is no consensus regarding the causes of the modern warming period, how reliable predictions of future temperatures can be, and whether future global warming will be harmful or beneficial. After you read the article, send it to the very next person who claims there is a consensus on this issue. As the article states: ” those who say the time for debate is over are at odds with half of the scientists they claim to be speaking for.”
http://blogs.woodtv.com/?p=2269
21. Even UN IPCC Concedes Antarctica not melting away
Global Warming Debate Upside-Down: Antarctic Update
Excerpt: If you consult the latest report of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), you would find statements on the subject in the summary including “Antarctic sea ice extent continues to show inter-annual variability and localized changes but no statistically significant average trends, consistent with the lack of warming reflected in atmospheric temperatures averaged across the region” and “Current global model studies project that the Antarctic ice sheet will remain too cold for widespread surface melting and is expected to gain in mass due to increased snowfall.” Amazing – one would never suspect such conclusions given a cover story in National Geographic titled “THE BIG THAW.”
22. How the “Climate-Change” faithful spin cold weather
Excerpt: The “Climate-Change” faithful now have the power to levitate above the embarrassment of awkward evidence. To deal with exceptions, they have conceived the metaphysical category of the “Extreme Event”. This phrase does not refer to weather which has extreme consequences, such as the past 48 hours in Victoria. The significance is altogether different. The “Extreme Event” is a device for ruling out the very possibility of contrary evidence and, thus, for denying the prospect of Popperian falsification. < > If all swings in the weather are worshipped as manifestations of “Climate Change”, that hypothesis is elevated above the realm of rational enquiry. Its advocates have entered the domain of theology where all outcomes — even the cruelest — are accepted as God’s working in his mysterious ways to reveal his omnipotent Goodness.
http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/002161.html
23. Global warming has its upside
Excerpt: Yet to the delight of some global warming naysayers, previously cool vineyard regions are finding that climate change can offer good news. Where once only two or three German vintages each decade saw ripe grapes, now nearly every vintage has been riper. Nearby northern France has seen the same.
http://www.kansascity.com/living/food/story/193259.html
24. Is Gore correct in asserting mankind is causing more droughts?
Gore’s testimony of 21 March 2007 before the United States Senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee for confirmation of this fact, wherein he states – without equivocation – that “droughts are becoming longer and more intense,” but, of course, without offering any evidence in support of his contention.
The 30 major droughts of the 20th century were likely natural in all respects; and, hence, they are “indicative of what could also happen in the future,” as Narisma et al. state in their concluding paragraph.
http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2ScienceB2C/articles/V10/N29/EDIT.jsp
25. Snowless in a warming world, ski resort in French Alps bids adieu
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/07/19/europe/EU-GEN-France-Too-Warm-To-Ski.php
26. Gore: human species in a race for its life
Excerpt: “What we’re facing worldwide really is a planetary emergency,” Gore said. “I’m optimistic, but we’re losing this battle badly.” <> Gore has spent 30 years trying to bring the world around to the effects of global climate change, and the last several touring with his slideshow (now the Oscar-winning documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth”), writing books, and teaching 1,400 people worldwide how to deliver the global warming message in several different languages. Next week it will be China, then India.
http://www.aspendailynews.com/article_20762
27. Animal Rights Activists Have ‘No Choice’ but Violence, Spokesman Says
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200707/CUL20070719b.html
27. Environmental Extremists Likely to Attack, Says NIE
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200707/CUL20070719a.html
28. Greenpeace plan nude global warming stunt
http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/07/19/1982884.htm
29. Eco-warrior Al Gore serves up endangered fish at daughter’s party
30. Humane Society criticizes Gore for serving threatened fish species at daughter’s wedding
Excerpt: ONLY one week after Live Earth, Al Gore’s green credentials slipped while hosting his daughter’s wedding in Beverly Hills. Gore and his guests at the weekend ceremony dined on Chilean sea bass – arguably one of the world’s most threatened fish species.
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22090734-5001031,00.html
Claim: Restaurant claims Gore did not dine on endangered fish
Excerpt: [The fish] had come from one of the world’s few well-managed, sustainable populations of toothfish, and were caught and documented in compliance with Marine Stewardship Council regulations.
31. Scientists invent device to stop Global Warming
Excerpt: Chemists at the University of California, San Diego have created a device that uses sunlight to transform harmful CO2 gas into fuel that could replace all the gasoline used in transportation.
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/nextnews7.16b.html
32. IT AIN’T EASY BEING GREEN, AL
http://nypress.com/20/16/news&columns/JohnDeSio.cfm
33. Island of Vanuatu rates happiest nation on Earth roundup
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6897485.stm
34. Corn biofuel ‘dangerously oversold’ as green energy
35. Continuing the Green Revolution – By NORMAN E. BORLAUG
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118472139326369773.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries
36. Global warming may bench a baseball staple
Excerpt: The White Ash Tree is in danger of being wiped out, and that could threaten a long baseball tradition. The wood from the ash tree has been used for decades to create a majority of the nation’s baseball bats, including those for Major League Baseball.
http://global-warming.accuweather.com/2007/07/baseball_bats_and_global_warmi.html
37. Mars Once Shuffled Its Icy Poles
http://www.livescience.com/space/scienceastronomy/070713_mars_ice.html
38. Meat is murder on the environment
http://environment.newscientist.com/article/mg19526134.500-meat-is-murder-on-the-environment.html
39. Gun battle over valuable wild fungus kills 8, wounds 44 in China
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22098335-5006003,00.html
40. What It Feels Like…to Be Mauled By a Bear
Excerpt: Then its teeth were in my left thigh. I thought, How strange, I’m actually being bitten by something. The grizzly’s fangs sank to my femur, and it jerked me all over the trail. I couldn’t tuck into a fetal position, so my front side was exposed, and I thought, Man, it’s going to rip my intestines out. So I dove off the trail, about twenty feet down.
Dense alder bushes broke my fall, and it looked like the bear might ease off. I yelled, “Jenna, come down here!” At the sound of my voice, the grizzly came charging down at me fast — like you can’t imagine how fast, like out-of-this-world fast. I curled into the fetal position. The bear’s jaws clamped on my backpack and lifted me up and down. I tried to scramble out from under it but instead forced us into another tumble thirty feet down the mountain. < > It gnawed on my head, and I could feel flesh tearing away. I grabbed the animal by the throat; its fur felt like a dirty wet dog, only thicker. I hit it with a rock, but the rock crumbled, so I wiggled back into the fetal position. Its teeth cut deep into the bottom of my skull; I actually heard bone cracking.
http://www.esquire.com/dont-miss/wifl/mauledbybear0807
Many thanks to Marc Morano for all these links.
Happy reading and have a good weekend.
SJT says
Marc, you and McIntyre make a good set, like Zig and Zag. The coldest areas of the planet are showing some of the biggest warming up there. If anything, it’s underestimating the average, but IIRC, the methods used to calculate the temperature take these things into account anyway.
SJT says
Marc
once again, can you at least read the IPCC report, and understand what it says, before you give us complete waffle that wastes every one’s time.
“The climate forces which have led to the estimated 0.6C degree temperature increase over the past 100 years or more (according to the International Panel on Climate Change) have been assumed to be man-made CO2 emissions from advanced nations including the U.S. We know this can’t be true for several reasons. The first is that water vapor provides 95 percent of the total of the greenhouse gases, not CO2. The total of the CO2 represents less than 3 percent of the total. The second is that of the total atmospheric CO2 inventory, the manmade fraction is less than 3 percent of the CO2 total and therefore far less than 1 percent of the total greenhouse gas inventories. Third, studies of the recent climate variations are finding, for example, (See article by J. Oestermans, Science, p. 375, April 29, 2005) that glaciers have been receding since 1750 or so, well before any significant man-made CO2 emissions occurred. The mid 1700s were at the very depths of the Little Ice Age, which we have learned was the coldest climate over the last 5000 years. Obviously, other warming forces were at work before humans had anything to do with it.”
We know that, they explicity say that. The issue is not the direct warming from CO2 but the “enhanced” effect from feedback, such as change of Albedo. For gods sake, can we ever hope to have a sane debate here?
As for the glaciers, that is just an outright lie. The rate has been decreasing, slowly, and it has accelerated rapidly in recent years, that is the issue.
Ian Mott says
So, increased precipitation in Antarctica. This is a place where evaporation is zero so increased precipitation means increased ice deposition.
And as this precipitation can only be sourced from the worlds oceans it can only mean that Antarctica is lowering sea levels. And as Antarctica is 10 times bigger than Greenland then it becomes clear to all but the climatically cretinous that a 1mm increase in Antarctic precipitation would offset a 10mm decline in the thickness of the Greenland ice sheet. Thats the 1,500,000mm thick Greenland Ice Sheet.
But this, of course, is basic maths. It never could be trusted, could it? Ideologically unsound, to say the least.
SJT says
Ian
your making projections based on models again.
Robert says
“Coldest Temperature Stations shut down in old Soviet Union caused artificial rise in global average temp”
Possibly, but against that is the evidence of warming in the permafrost: http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/essay_romanovsky.html
In any case, argument is more about what is causing the warming, not whether or not it is warming.
Ender says
Ian Mott – “And as Antarctica is 10 times bigger than Greenland then it becomes clear to all but the climatically cretinous that a 1mm increase in Antarctic precipitation would offset a 10mm decline in the thickness of the Greenland ice sheet.”
However you know what they say about people in glass houses:
“Measurements of Time-Variable Gravity Show Mass Loss in Antarctica
Isabella Velicogna1,2* and John Wahr1*
Using measurements of time-variable gravity from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment satellites, we determined mass variations of the Antarctic ice sheet during 2002–2005. We found that the mass of the ice sheet decreased significantly, at a rate of 152 ± 80 cubic kilometers of ice per year, which is equivalent to 0.4 ± 0.2 millimeters of global sea-level rise per year. Most of this mass loss came from the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.”
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/311/5768/1754
Even if precipitation is increasing this is being offset by greater loss at the margins.
Robert says
I had never heard of time variable gravity measurements. This abstract gives a little information about what they are http://www.ecgs.lu/pdf/jlg89/JLG89_5_Wahr.pdf
However, 152+/-80m3 has an uncertaintly exceeding +/- 50%. In other words an extremely unreliable measurement.
Ian Mott says
I agree, Robert. More gullible science that is just plausible enough to fool a journalist, (or a fanatic) Ender.
Mean annual precipitation over most of Antarctica is 50mm (ice equivalent) over an ice sheet that is 2,000,000mm to 3,000,000mm thick. So the instrumentation would need to be sensitive enough to detect a change of 50/3,000,000 or 0.00166 of 1%. Fat chance.
After adjusting for higher falls near the coastline we get a total annual deposition of more than 1000km3. So for the above quoted study to be true then the ice shelves and sub-ice rivers etc would need to be discharging 1150km2 each year.
And as climate cretins simply can’t help themselves from quoting the gross loss to scare the kids, we can be certain that we would have heard of this number before if it were anywhere near the truth.
I’ll leave it to you to figure out what a 50% error margin on a 0.00166% sensitivity level would be.
SJT says
Jennifer,
what is the point of these topics? You post a laundry list of random pot shots, and say happy reading.
The net effect is nothing, it’s just white noise.
Could you perhaps just tell us what you think, or what Marc thinks, and try to get some rational debate happening? Threads like this just lead to nowhere.
Woody says
Wait…wait. Could one conclude from all these articles that maybe there isn’t a “consensus” on global warming?!
SJT says
Yes Woody, they have served their purpose. With enough arm waving, it becomes unclear.
Jennifer says
SJT, Maybe its entitled ‘some weekend reading” because its intended for general interest and entertainment? Post a comment if you find something interesting, but don’t feel compelled to force a particular issue. 🙂 It is Sunday tomorrow. Relax. PUt your feet up.
PS I found the grizzly bear encounter (no 40.) fascinating reading! And the guy survived!
rog says
So did I, for more unbearably grizzly yarns read these
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/wildlife/bears/attacks/
Ender says
Ian Mott – “I agree, Robert. More gullible science that is just plausible enough to fool a journalist, (or a fanatic) Ender.”
So we are completely abandoning the science and we are all to rely now on the wisdom of Ian Mott.
I am sure that the people investigating the mystery of dark matter will be very interested in this new source – have you contacted them?