• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Jennifer Marohasy

Jennifer Marohasy

a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment

  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Speaker
  • Blog
  • Temperatures
  • Coral Reefs
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Europe: Delay in Autumn Leaf Colour Caused by Increased CO2, not Global Warming

November 14, 2007 By jennifer

The delay in autumnal leaf coloration and leaf fall in trees is caused by rising levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere and not by increased global temperatures, suggests a new study by researchers at the University of Southampton.

In recent years, woodland autumnal colour changes have been occurring later in the season whilst re-greening in spring has been occurring earlier. During the last 30 years across Europe, autumnal senescence – the process of plant aging where leaves discolour and then fall – has been delayed by 1.3 – 1.8 days a decade. To date, this has been explained by global warming, with increasing temperatures causing longer growing seasons.

However, while a strong correlation has been observed between increased global temperatures and earlier spring re-greening and bud break, the correlation between autumn leaf colour change and fall and temperature trends in 14 European countries is weak.

Over the 30 years that progressive delays in autumnal senescence have been observed, atmospheric CO2 has risen by 13.5 per cent. Experimental studies show that increased atmospheric CO2 affects plant physiology and function, influencing a myriad of processes.

The Southampton researchers undertook two large forest ecosystem experiments in which poplar (Populus) trees in separate plots were exposed to either ambient or elevated levels of CO2 from planting to maturity. The elevated concentration was at 550 parts per million, proposed as representative of concentrations that may occur in 2050. Changes in the tree canopy were measured by remote sensing.

The trees exposed to elevated CO2 retained their leaves for longer and also experienced a smaller decline in end of season chlorophyll content, resulting in a greener autumn canopy relative to that in ambient CO2.

Professor Gail Taylor, of the University’s School of Biological Sciences, explains:
‘The research data provide compelling evidence in terms of both the leaf and canopy that autumnal senescence in such forest ecosystems will be delayed as the atmospheric concentration of CO2 continues to rise, independent of increased temperatures.

‘Photosynthesis and canopy greenness are maintained for longer in elevated CO2. This is because a CO2 rich atmosphere allows the tree to generate carbon rich compounds that are known to prolong the life of leaves. These compounds may have a positive effect for carbon balance and stress tolerance but may also have a negative effect on the control of dormancy.

‘When trees keep their leaves for longer, they continue to photosynthesise but trees also need to set bud and if they don’t do that, it makes them susceptible to frost and other weather events. A key question now is whether we should be selecting trees which are better adapted to coping with increasing levels of CO2, perhaps considering different varieties and species to plant, rather than using locally sourced seed, as is current practice,’ she continues.

The study also provides the first insight into changes in the genetic make-up of Populus that can account for this shift to delayed senescence. Using cDNA microarrays, the researchers looked at approximately 20,000 genes and have identified a suite of genes that are switched on during delayed senescence in elevated CO2.

News Release from the University of Southampton:

New research suggests delay in autumn colour is caused by increased atmospheric CO2 not global warming

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Climate & Climate Change

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Woody says

    November 15, 2007 at 6:36 am

    Where I live, the peak season for leaf color varies each year, and that has been the pattern going back long before CO2 or global warming was being hyped. The patterns, up and down, were said to primarily follow the amount of rainfall during the summer. If rising CO2 or global warming were the only things to blame, then the fall season would be extending into spring.

  2. Green Davey Gam Esq. says

    November 15, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    Wouldn’t a longer green period be a benefit? More photosynthesis, so more production of oxygen, and more removal of CO2? Anyway, isn’t more green always good?

  3. Arnost says

    November 15, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    Davey

    Now there’s a negative feedback that increased warming will cause! Wonder if it’s factored into the models…

  4. Green Davey Gam Esq. says

    November 16, 2007 at 6:21 pm

    Arnost,
    I am working on a model which relates extra oxygen, from longer green periods, to increased activity in humans, so reducing obesity. This will reduce fuel consumption on flights, and other public transport. The extra greenery will also feed more bugs, hence birds, hence greater biodiversity. It’s win-win-win all the way. How do I apply for the Nobel Prize? (Stop chewing your finger nails, Luke.)

Primary Sidebar

Latest

Complicating the IPCC Planck Feedback, Plank #4 of Climate Resilience Theory

June 1, 2025

The Moon’s Tidal Push

May 30, 2025

How Climate Works. In Discussion with Philip Mulholland about Carbon Isotopes

May 14, 2025

In future, I will be More at Substack

May 11, 2025

How Climate Works: Upwellings in the Eastern Pacific and Natural Ocean Warming

May 4, 2025

Recent Comments

  • Climate Realist on Complicating the IPCC Planck Feedback, Plank #4 of Climate Resilience Theory
  • Don Gaddes on Complicating the IPCC Planck Feedback, Plank #4 of Climate Resilience Theory
  • Don Gaddes on Complicating the IPCC Planck Feedback, Plank #4 of Climate Resilience Theory
  • Max Wilson on Complicating the IPCC Planck Feedback, Plank #4 of Climate Resilience Theory
  • cohenite on Complicating the IPCC Planck Feedback, Plank #4 of Climate Resilience Theory

Subscribe For News Updates

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

PayPal

November 2007
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Oct   Dec »

Archives

Footer

About Me

Jennifer Marohasy Jennifer Marohasy BSc PhD is a critical thinker with expertise in the scientific method. Read more

Subscribe For News Updates

Subscribe Me

PayPal

Contact Me

To get in touch with Jennifer call 0418873222 or international call +61418873222.

Email: J.Marohasy@climatelab.com.au

Connect With Me

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · Genesis - Jen Marohasy Custom On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in