It was good to see Professor John Quiggin drawing attention to the problems with the Macquarie Marshes in his post of last Sunday titled ‘Macquarie Marshes again’.
But it’s a pity he can’t get beyond ad hominem attacks [1] and a pitch for his ARC fellowship, which is about trading water in the Murray Darling Basin. And it really is naive to suggest, as Professor Quiggin does, that we can “restore the Murray-Darling Basin to a sustainable balance” simply by taking water from irrigators.
Putting aside the question of whether environments are ever in ‘balance’, there are three particularly pressing issues for the Macquarie Marshes:
1. Getting water to the nature reserve including for the reed beds,
2. Preventing the trampling of bird nesting sites by cattle, and
3. Addressing the general issues of overgrazing.
The Macquarie Marshes is a large non-termial wetland in central western New South Wales covering about 200,000 hectares. Most of this area (88 percent) is privately owned and grazed. There are two publicly-owned nature reserves where cattle are excluded and which are Ramsar-listed, meaning they are considered of international importance for migratory bird species.
It is reasonable to assume that water taken from irrigators for environmental flow purposes will be directed first to these nature reserves. Yet both local graziers and upstream irrigators have sent me photographs and letters complaining that water is being directed away from the nature reserves to private land.
Following is a satellite photograph with the green area showing where the marshes flooded in December 1999. The yellow line shows the boundary of the southern nature reserve. It is evident from this photograph that something is blocking water from flowing into the reserve. This something is a levy bank on private land that according to the NSW government has been in place for approximately 15 years [2].
As I explained in an article recently published by On Line Opinion: “The only real monitoring of the biodiversity of the marshes has been the breeding of water birds. Bird-breeding sites were first mapped in the late 1970s. At this time the major breeding colonies were along the Macquarie River and most within the nature reserve. But over the past 30 years there has been a migration east to the Terrigal-Gum Cowal wetland, which is all on private land. The last big waterbird breeding event in the marshes was in 2000, and ten of the 12 main breeding colonies were located on private land with only two in the nature reserve.”
Local graziers tell me that when the birds breed in the nature reserve they are protected from the cattle, but when they are forced to breed on heavily grazed marsh lands their nests are often trampled. Fifty years ago there were restrictions on grazing on the private land in the marshes, in particular there was a regulation stating that all rookeries for bird nesting and breeding had be completely enclosed with a sheep and cattle proof fence. There are nolonger any such conditions.
Water has apparently even been redirected from the adjacent Marra Creek system through the recent construction of an additional weir, all on the pretext the water was needed for the marshes. Marra Creek graziers have subsequently watched the water directed not to the nature reserve, but to heavily grazed private land.
Not all of the private land within the marshes is overgrazed. But there was evidence of overgrazing when I visited the marshes last October and I have been sent photographs and emails from some upstream irrigators and some local graziers explaining to me that many areas, including areas that have received recent environmental flow allocations, are severely overgrazed. Here’s one of those photographs:
The evidence would seem overwhelming that all is not well in the Macquarie Marshes and that simply taking water from upstream irrigators, as suggested by Professor Quiggin, is not going to fix the problem.
——————————————————
[1] It is also somewhat amusing that Professor Quiggin could suggest I’m against the grazing industry. I grew up with buffalo and cattle at Coomalie Creek in the Northern Territory and charolais at Conondale in south east Queensland. I was awarded the Cattleman’s Union Industry Research Medal in 1991 for my work in Madagascar, and was recently invited to speak at the annual Australian Beef Industry Dinner on 11th August.
[2] The levy is pictured at my blog post of 12 April 2005 titled ‘But Reed Beds Need Water’ along with comment from government officers, click here.
rog says
jennifer, it would appear that there already exists quite some evidence but it needs to be collated into a single document – not an easy task – more funds needed?
Surely allocating resources into a proper study would be at least as beneficial as buying water licenses. More water upstream does not necessarily mean an increase in more water to reed beds and other habitat – the flow can be diverted elsewhere.
Graham Finlayson says
Jennifer,
I’d agree we need some research on grazing methodology and I don’t necessarily view you as anti-grazing, although if the arguement is between sheep/cattle and your beloved irrigation then you do seem biased toward the cotton industry.
Which industry do you believe would be best suited to be complimentary to the river systems, given best management practices??.
Focussing your many comments on this topic based on a couple of photo’s is not particularly useful or accurate. Maybe I’m cynical, but it seems a poor case of point scoring, although if there are diversion banks involved then I would agree with you arguing against those. Just using them for an excuse to get the cattle out and take some pressure off irrigators is outrageous.
Diversion banks that cause massive flow disruptions are plentiful on the Culgoa/Balonne system, and it would be good to see you as fervent in your appraisal of that issue, as it dwarfs the Macquarie marshes in ecolgical and economic impact.
Joe says
Jen
Resign yourself. The only thing Quiggin does well is the pesonal attack. He seems incapable of any original thought and when he does put his paws out on that score he makes people giggle.
jennifer says
Graham,
I’ve started trying to understand the Culgoa/Balonne/Cubbie system a couple of times. But just getting a simple plot of flood heights downstream of Cubbie against rainfall in the catchments is still pending from early last year. Is there someone out there who’s a bit persistent who can work with data/use microsoft excel and make phone calls to landholders and government who would like to work with me on this one?
And I’m not sure why you think the Macquarie Marshes are less impacted and perhaps also less ecologically significant than the Balonne/Culgoa floodplains?
Graham Finlayson says
Jen,
I’ll see if I can contact a couple of people I know that can give you some info. There is a lot of information around that you would probably dismiss as heresay, and that has been the flood plain graziers dillema. The scientific studies go on and on, with no difinitive decisions ever being made. Meanwhile the developement continues on unabated.
Sorry, I should not have compared the marshes to the floodplain, as I don’t really know enough about them to make that comment. It was merely to highlight the difference in your level of interest, that’s all. I still think that there would be a lot more people and landscape detrimentally affected by new developement in this system.
A neighbour of mine showed me a diary of his fathers once that mentioned the Birrie river flooding out twice during the year. About 1922 I think, and the rainfall measured for the year was only 5 and a half inches.(Average 16)
And yet from 1995 till 2000 we averaged almost 21 inches and did not get a flow, let alone a flood…..
but that’s only heresay…
John Quiggin says
As a point of clarification, my Fellowship is not about water trading in the Murray Darling, but about sustainable management.
I support water trading because, like nearly every other economist who’s looked at this issue (and these days most environmentalists as well), I regard it as an essential element of any policy that can achieve sustainable outcomes.
Tinxi says
so WHO is the nameless faceless owner of the private (& illegal? or unapproved) levy bank who escapes all local pressure and govt action?