• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Jennifer Marohasy

Jennifer Marohasy

a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment

  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Speaker
  • Blog
  • Temperatures
  • Coral Reefs
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Incitement Charges Dropped Against Zoe Buhler from Ballarat

August 31, 2022 By jennifer

Melbourne was once a vibrant city full of culture and freedoms. Then suddenly it became a dystopian nightmare.

There was an 8pm curfew.

Visiting friends or family during the one hour each day citizens were allowed to leave their home was banned.

Everyone was expected to get vaccinated – not just once, but repeatedly against the flu we have come to know as Covid 19.

Protesting the lockdown and the vaccination mandate was banned.

On Wednesday, 2 September 2020, Zoe Buhler was arrested and handcuffed at her home in the nearby city of Ballarat. She was charged with ‘incitement’ under the Victorian Crimes Act. She was facing a criminal conviction and a penalty of up to A$19,000. Her alleged crime was that on her Facebook page she encouraged friends to gather at the local park to ‘end lockdowns’ and take a ‘stand for human rights’.

Zoe Buhler was not the only woman to be handcuffed by the Victorian police for incitement. Craig Kelly made a video showing how it was back then. He was scrubbed from Facebook, and lost his once safe seat of Hughes at the federal election.

A key difference for Zoe Buhler was that her partner recorded the arrest live on Facebook, and it went viral. Her sister got in contact with Craig Kelly then a member of parliament, who phoned John Roskam and a legal defence was organised including Stuart Wood QC, Ruth Shann, and Stephen Andrianakis. Andrew Cooper started a fundraising appeal with a target of $300,000. Thank you if you donated here.

Justice does not come cheap in Australia, and incarceration is too common.

Yesterday, Victorian government prosecutors applied to the Ballarat Magistrates Court to withdraw the charge.

The Institute of Public Affairs supported Zoe’s legal fight and welcomed the outcome. IPA research has consistently exposed how the rule of law has been undermined as part of the Victorian Government’s excessive and arbitrary public health response and is now calling on the Victorian government to grant an immediate amnesty for all Victorians who were fined and charged under the covid rules for exercising their basic rights and freedoms.

Justice At Last – Incitement Charge Against Zoe Buhler Dropped

For those assuming Zoe did something wrong, following is my understanding of the detail as copied and pasted from @martynlloydiles at the Australian Christian Lobby, written back in 2020.

Here is a list, in no particular order, of the problems with Zoe Lee’s arrest.

1. She probably did not commit the crime of incitement. It requires first, intent, and second, for the crime incited to have actually happened. (See Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 321G). She was probably falsely arrested.

2. Daniel Andrews claimed, when questioned the following day (today), that he had not seen the video. This is either a lie, or he specifically told his staff not to show it to him so that he could say he had not seen it.

3. The Assistant Police Commissioner (APC) distinguished her event from BLM because hers was during stage 4 lockdown, and BLM was during stage 3. Wilfully deceptive. Ballarat – the location of Zoe’s event – is in stage 3 lockdown.

4. The APC distinguished her event from BLM on the basis that BLM encouraged social distancing and mask wearing. So did her event, very specifically… I quote, “All social distancing measures are to be followed so we don’t get arrested please. Please wear a mask unless you have a medical reason not to.” Again, wilfully deceptive.

5. The APC said, ‘While this deadly virus doesn’t discriminate, we won’t discriminate and we can’t discriminate, in holding people to account.’ – err, Black Lives Matter, anyone??? This made me snort my coffee out my nose. VicPol are not enforcing a righteous standard, but a political one. Agree with their politics, they lie to defend you. Disagree, they lie to falsely arrest you.

6. The police simply do not have to handcuff a person, do not have to arrest a person, and do not have to execute a search warrant under these circumstances. Doing do is unusual on all three counts. The doing of all three, in front of her family, whilst pregnant and compliant, is nothing short of intimidation tactics. (Not to mention she committed no crime, see point 1).

7. From her interview the following day: ‘Sorry about my bimbo moment, but I didn’t realise I wasn’t allowed to. I wanted to protest in Melbourne but obviously realised I wasn’t allowed to do that … so I just wanted to feel like I was doing something, you know standing up for human rights, and you know I am just a passionate person and I am sick of the lockdowns, I am sick of hearing about suicides, I personally lost my job, and I am just sick of watching the economy collapse. It got to the point where I just wanted to peacefully protest.’ Okay, so she is not some sort of anti-lockdown fanatic, or serial protester, or any such thing… and she intended no harm. This accords with the phrasing of her event – among other words, she said, ‘Here in Ballarat we can be a voice for those in stage 4 lockdowns.’

8. Despite point 7, above, the APC implied very heavily in his press conference that she probably had a history of negative police interactions which led to her handcuffing. Rather unfair conjecture.

9. Even if she did seem to breach the Crimes Act, the Act is not allowed to be applied in a way that infringes on her freedom to politically communicate. This is a well known constitutional law doctrine in Australia, and state law is limited on this basis.

10. Even if she did seem to breach the Crimes Act, she has a further protection. The Victorian Police are not allowed to carry out their duties in a manner that breaches the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities which includes the rights to ‘peaceful assembly and freedom of association’ and ‘freedom of expression’ …

****
The feature image shows me in pyjamas similar to the flannels Zoe Buhler was wearing when she was arrested in September 2020. The photograph was to help with the fundraising back then.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Freedom of Speech

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Rod McLean says

    August 31, 2022 at 11:28 am

    This is just one of the reasons I joined the IPA some years ago – its support for human rights.

  2. Allan says

    August 31, 2022 at 11:32 am

    Are ‘they’ waking up to their monstrous crime against peace loving Ozzies, or just cover their tracks to set up an excuse ‘we did all the right things under the circumstances’ to avoid being hauled before the court of Nuremberg 2.0?

  3. Mike says

    August 31, 2022 at 11:44 am

    An ex Cop told me the Police Force attracts the best and worst.
    Also not much is heard these days of the Belt and Road funding and associated authoritarian strings Dan Andrews tried to sign up for.

  4. John Miller says

    August 31, 2022 at 11:44 am

    Bill Muehlenberg says:

    “Well done Zoe. You are a champion. You really did go through hell for such a long time. Finally a bit of justice. Finally a bit of good news. But as I say, will we hear one word of apology from Dictator Dan and his thugs about this? Not on your life. All the more reason to kick them out of office this November.”

    https://billmuehlenberg.com/2022/08/30/resisting-tyranny-is-always-worth-it/

  5. john says

    August 31, 2022 at 12:48 pm

    I hope she sues for wrongful arrest.

  6. Dr Christine Finlay says

    August 31, 2022 at 1:23 pm

    My experience of the initial covid response was odd because the response was SO forseeably futile. The governement directed me to get tested along with a few hundred others who were possibly exposed. The directive came about four days after exposure – so a large herd of people had been possibly spreading the virus for this time. Then the governement posted a directive that the herd should go into quarantine. A few days into my quarantine I got a threatening phone call from a government official. Her role was to warn me of the dire consequences of stepping outside my front gate. I was also directed to get another test because the first test was done too early to rule out infection. The second test also showed I didn’t have it. Apparently just me alone cost the government about $400 at that point at $200 a test plus the cost of the campaign’s infrastructure. Time will tell with the new laissez faire covid model that is the new normal.

  7. Bruce says

    August 31, 2022 at 1:54 pm

    ALWAYS keep in mind the old saying about such matters:

    “The process IS the PUNISHMENT!”

    That thought is best kept in mind when dealing with “government” or ANY bureaucratic body.

  8. Karl Penna says

    August 31, 2022 at 5:11 pm

    This just shows how much we need the IPA

  9. Avatar photojennifer says

    September 1, 2022 at 8:35 am

    Some comments from Zoe and John outside the court here: https://www.facebook.com/7NEWSMelbourne/videos/3309343932718068

    It didn’t make the ABC or The Australian or The Guardian. All three are shamefully negligent when it comes to actually reporting the news.

  10. Geoffrey Williams says

    September 2, 2022 at 7:32 am

    The actions of The Australian Police Force and the Government in the arrest Zoe Buhler are nothing short of digracefull. Our Australian media also has much to answer for.
    We must always stand up for the right to free speech. Well done Jennifer . .

  11. ianl says

    September 5, 2022 at 2:58 pm

    The case was dropped before the Court hearing simply to avoid embarrassment for both VicPol and the Andrews Govt if/when the Court decided the arrest was unlawful or disproportionate.

    Such cowards they are … push a pregnant woman around in front of her children and then run away from accountability for that.

  12. Ian George says

    September 14, 2022 at 7:22 am

    Sorry Jennifer as this comment is OT.
    Re the BoM failure to record Lismore rainfall. I clearly remember the AWS at the Lismore Airport recording around 330ml at around 3:00am (1 Mar 22) before the data disappeared. It continued raining heavily all night. Sometimes the BoM will record data in grey if it is unverified but not this time.
    (I could not find the comment section for the article re Lismore).

  13. Peter McRae says

    September 18, 2022 at 5:27 pm

    Well done all who stand up to Chairman Dan.

Primary Sidebar

Latest

Re-imaging Tasmania’s Temperature History, Part 1

March 26, 2023

The 1.5 C Temperature Fiction, Already Exceeded

March 21, 2023

Government & Media Censorship & Matt Taibbi

March 16, 2023

Hyping Maximum Daily Temperatures (Part 7)

February 17, 2023

Hyping Maximum Daily Temperatures (Part 6)

February 16, 2023

Recent Comments

  • Richard Bennett on The 1.5 C Temperature Fiction, Already Exceeded
  • Brian Johnston on The 1.5 C Temperature Fiction, Already Exceeded
  • sam on The 1.5 C Temperature Fiction, Already Exceeded
  • David Tanner on The 1.5 C Temperature Fiction, Already Exceeded
  • Karl J Penna on Government & Media Censorship & Matt Taibbi

Subscribe For News Updates

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

PayPal

August 2022
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Jul   Nov »

Archives

Footer

About Me

Jennifer Marohasy Jennifer Marohasy BSc PhD is a critical thinker with expertise in the scientific method. Read more

Subscribe For News Updates

Subscribe Me

PayPal

Contact Me

To get in touch with Jennifer call 0418873222 or international call +61418873222.

Email: J.Marohasy@climatelab.com.au

Connect With Me

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2014 - 2022 Jennifer Marohasy. All rights reserved. | Legal

Website by Internet Thinking