On 10 December 2006 the Australian Prime Minister announced the establishment of a joint government-business Task Group on Emissions Trading. Yesterday, the Report of the Task Group on Emissions Trading was publicly released. It “outlines the state of play in international cooperation on climate change and the possible development of emissions trading at the global level. Against this background, the Report outlines a proposed Australian domestic emissions trading scheme, together with a set of complementary policies and measures, that would enable Australia to position itself for international developments while maintaining economic growth and safeguarding our competitive advantage.”
The report includes comment that, “The most common type of emissions trading systems are known as ‘cap and trade’ schemes. Under such a scheme, the government determines limits on greenhouse gas emissions (that is, sets a target or cap) and issues tradable emissions permits up to this limit. Each permit represents the right to emit a specified quantity of greenhouse gas (for example, one tonne of CO2-e). Businesses must hold enough permits to cover the greenhouse gas emissions they produce each year. Permits can be bought and sold, with the price determined by the supply of and demand for permits. Governments can choose how they wish to allocate permits, for example, by auctioning, grandfathering, benchmarking, allocating to meet specific equity objectives, or any combination of these options (a more detailed discussion of these methodologies is included in Chapter 7).
By placing a price on emissions, trading allows market forces to find least cost ways of reducing emissions by providing incentives for firms to reduce emissions where this would be cheapest, while allowing continuation of emissions where they are most costly to reduce. This underlines the fact that emissions trading is not an objective in itself, but a means of achieving a certain level of abatement at the lowest cost possible.”
Paul Kelly writing in The Australian newspaper has commented, “The essence of John Howard’s belated response to climate change is to commit early, think global and implement slowly. After years of dispute and scepticism, Australia now has a strategic blueprint for action — a blueprint superior to the defect-ridden European emission trading regime.
“This is the start of Australia exerting serious influence on the global debate. In substantive terms, it closes the gulf between Howard and Kevin Rudd on climate change. It insists that Australia must act now and not wait for global agreement. It makes the timetable for emission trading almost bipartisan — Howard in 2011 and Labor by 2010.
“While Howard’s report does not specify a target — in response to Rudd’s 60 per cent cut by 2050 — its entire “cap and trade” scheme depends upon a long-term target to be finalised next year after more analysis. Labor, equally, wants the scheme’s design finalised “by the end of 2008”.
And yesterday the Australian Prime Minister announced his support for a new US climate change initiative, a new post-Kyoto framework.
John Howard said, “The Australian Government welcomes the United States’ initiative announced overnight to build a broader coalition for practical international climate change action. This is a genuine attempt to get past the political stand-offs of previous negotiations, to cut through the entrenched positions of the north-south divide enshrined in the Kyoto Protocol and instead to focus on real solutions.
“My Government has consistently championed the need for practical action that makes a difference. In particular, we have advocated meaningful co-operation with developing countries and a new global framework in which all major economies feel able to participate.
“The US initiative – and the recent statement by Japan calling for a new global response that goes beyond Kyoto and brings in all major emitters – is further evidence that a new international consensus on climate change is starting to emerge.
“Australia has been very active in shaping this emerging consensus, which represents a significant move away from the empty symbolism of Kyoto towards the approach the Government has consistently advocated. The Government has been in frequent contact with the US Administration and our other key international partners.
“We have been at the forefront of practical, regional initiatives such as the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (AP6) and the Clean Coal Partnership with China. The Government has launched a $200 million Global Forests Initiative to tackle deforestation and has put climate change at the centre of the APEC leaders’ agenda in September.
“The US approach recognises that to deal with climate change a multi-pronged strategy is required, including areas such as energy efficiency, technology development and transfer – including nuclear power – and forestry, as well as ways to adapt to changes in the climate.”
Jazza says
Considering we emit 1.5% of worlds total ghgs and by that “magical” 2050, would be down to 1% anyway, due to growth from Asia etc, there is only one course and thats a well considered and carefuly measured one
I think Howard will do this after debate etc, and set intermediary and longer term targets.
Mind you Im a GW skeptic but recognise the world political climate, well ,western democracies, has gone as mad about climate change as it has about dangerous breeds of dogs.
Possibly this will turn out as unscientific as the dogs issue,which is a human ownership and some individual bad dog issue at heart
… but,while we can ask qs…??
Exactly what degree of temperature lowering will occur with those targets like Rudd’s and of course Garrett’s closer(2020) one?
Do readers know that Australia’s emissions are equalled by India and China’s every 7 months–and they are increasing their outputs– so do we take the victim stance and keep tightening the belt every 7 months, or what?
I dont wanna freeze to death with no power thank you
Isnt is sensible to have all the countries working together and to make sure if we HAVE to pay costs that we get new technology out of it and dont have to start again half way through as the erest of the world goes the other “fork in the road”
Europes carbon trade rort is a fiasco we must avoid
I dismiss that our sea levels will swamp us unless we panic react NOW like yesterday!
1. It should be enough if science is true why do the alarmists want to invent fairy tales and keep dooming us to God knows what?
I smell a rat or three.
Worse when T Flannery exaggerates all the IPCC figures for his own ? ends
2. Australia’s sea levels have been measured and increase is only 1 millimetre annually!!!
You could even keep your socks on!
Funny how climate change is random —-like,
The arctic ice is melting we are told yet same time, 13 large fishing trawlers had to be saved from the bergs by Iceland;s icebreakers! and
some areas of Aus had a very warm May but the ski resorts in Vic are showing early deep snow to provide an excellent opening to ski season
Go figure
I await the Pms details tomorrow or whenever, if we gotta go with the flow ,lets make sure we dont end up S**t Creek with no paddle
Cheers
duncan says
Jennifer.
I admire your courage in publishing your musings warts and all.
As much as I respect the strengths of a science based approach to the creation of “truth” as with “evidence”; does that mean that the real extent of the situation is only bounded by available data or evidence?
Don’t you thing that using such a limited world view to manage complex, dynamic and ambiguous systems is dangerously flawed?
What about engaging self critically aware lived human experience as it has been documented? Is perhaps Al gores “An Inconvenient Truth” too inconvenient?
Howard!!! Is’nt his pandering to greed of contemporary interests, trashing the planet we bequeath to future generations? Perhaps only they will have enough data to answer that scientifically!
Convenient that we will not be around.
However I share the AEF’s concerns about The Wilderness Society “wet” elements of its support base and the opportunistic treachery of some of its operators.Just the same we are better with WS, than without it.
Cheers Duncan
PS) Please feel free to table all or part to your board.
Aaron Edmonds says
4000 hectares of mixed plantings Australian sandalwood and acacia will hit the ground in WA this year alone.Growth projected to increase to 10,000 hectares next year … anybody need a carbon sink?
Schiller Thurkettle says
I have no doubt that former Enron executives will be working as consultants behind this scam involving the purchase and sale of blue sky and cow farts.
I further note that the world’s most prominent investment houses take no strong financial positions in this fanciful market. They know it’s all methane and mirrors.
A crash is coming for investors in the CO2 trade, and the fallout will be bad. Enrons will be discovered everywhere, and bilked consumers will launch lawsuits which drive them into bankruptcy. Likely, into jail as well.