jennifermarohasy.com/blog - The Politics and Environment Blog

Main menu:

 

July 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Archives

Authors

Site search

Miniposts 0.6.5

Methane Leak
Scientists have discovered the Arctic ocean seabed is leaking huge amounts of methane into the atmosphere.  The research published in the journal Science shows the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic shelf, which was thought to be a barrier sealing methane, is perforated.  Read more here. (1)

NYT: Pachauri Faces Credibility Siege
The New York Times is reporting that: Dr. Pachauri and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are now under intense scrutiny, facing accusations of scientific sloppiness and potential financial conflicts of interest from climate skeptics, right-leaning politicians and even some mainstream scientists.  More here. (1)

Phil Jones Guilty, But
The university at the centre of the climate change row over stolen e-mails broke the law by refusing to hand over its raw data for public scrutiny.  B ut…  Read more here. (0)

Banks Leave Carbon Market
Banks and investors are pulling out of the carbon market after the failure to make progress at Copenhagen on reaching new emissions targets after 2012.  Read more here. (0)

UK Met Office Can't Forecast Weather
The UK Met Office is debating what to do with its long-term and seasonal forecasting after criticism for failing to predict extreme weather.   It was predicted that this winter would be warmer than average – yet it has been unusually cold.  Read more here. (2)

Advertisement

Links

Disclaimer: The inclusion of a blog or website in this list should not be taken as an endorsement of its contents by me.

Retaliatory Tariffs for Carbon Sceptics

In a world with a global carbon price, carbon efficiency will also become a new competitive battleground. Those economies that offer a more energy-efficient operating environment will become increasingly more attractive places to invest. Economies that refuse to act on climate change will run the risk of retaliatory tariffs from others.  Read more here from Australia’s Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd.

Advertisement

3 Responses to “Retaliatory Tariffs for Carbon Sceptics”

  1. Comment from: Larry Fields


    There’s a kind of perverse logic to the retaliatory tariffs idea. Fred Singer has pointed out that an asymmetric (unilateral) ETS–or an asymmetric carbon tax–could have a negligible impact on global carbon emissions. Why? Such policies would provide additional incentives for large corporations to export their manufacturing jobs to China and India. Both countries are Global Warming bah-humbugs (as am I).

    The upshot: Decreased carbon emissions from Europe and North America, and increased carbon emissions from Asia. Tilting the playing field in this way will DECREASE the efficiency of our global economy. The solution? Spread the misery with retaliatory tariffs. On the positive side of the ledger, retaliatory tariffs could partially reset the economic playing field to some extent.

    On the negative side, an ETS (or a carbon tax), coupled with retaliatory tariffs, would decrease the standard of living for working people everywhere. And there’s another possible fly in the ointment. Retaliatory tariffs are not a one-player game. Trade war, anyone?

  2. Comment from: Peter Machen


    Regardless of whatever action Australia, or the Global nations, take on reducing CO2 it will not significantly change the temperature of the planet. The science is already out there but the political bandwagon has lost its horses and is careering ahead unrestrained. Just like the GFC, Enron, etc. while there is money to be made by bagginf the carbon based energy sources, greed will find a way.

  3. Comment from: Larry Fields


    Oops! I left out one of the main points. The primary purpose of the retaliatory tariffs is to ram greenhouse gas emissions reductions down the throats of China and India, so that the regulations would have a truly global effect.

Leave a Reply