Thought this might enlighten you.

http://noteviljustwrong.com/blog/9-general/124-uk-lawyer-slams-gore-over-court-case-claims.html

BTW Lomborg points out in todays Australian that if all the Kyoto obligated countries did what was required, it would still only reduce the temperature by 0.22C by 2100.

Building the pyramids probably had a better cost benefit than this.

Only frauds and fools would be still persist with this nonsense.

The reason SJT asks is that he is blissfully unaware of his position as a “useful idiot”. It’s these who are unaware of being used.

Somewhere you disagreed that socialism tends to be environmentally destructive.

Here is evidence for the prosecution.

http://mat-rodina.blogspot.com/2009/07/death-of-aral.html

My case stands.

I was hoping you could tell me.

“over the last 15 years, all temperature data is showing the global temp going UP.”

This is supposed to prove the latest Global Climate Change pronouncements, handed down by the High Priests of GCC, that it is warming faster than projections??

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So, Little Sod, SJT, Luke…

How is that tropospheric hot spot coming along???? The IPCC claim that warming from ANY source should cause a hot spot. Is their physics wrong, or, is the data showing more than actual warming???

It is really irrelevant as the warming we have seen is benign and CONSISTENT WITH natural CC!!

How does it feel to be ignorant tools of religious nuts!!

SJT July 13th, 2009 at 9:18 am

WTF that certainly is Worse Than Failure. I accept that the climate changes to state the damn obvious but AGW means Anthropogenic Global Warming doesn’t it? The last time I looked Anthropogenic meant caused by humans and Global Warming was what was being caused. This in turn it is argued causes all the climate change that is going to kill Gaia.

So now we should concern ourselves with climate change that humans don’t cause. I see SJT you are changing sides. So please quantify. How much climate change is caused by other factors? What percentage is due to humans? There are a myriad of other causes that is what is being argued by the side that opposes you.

You will notice that SJT doesnt dispute the fact that Gore has a major conflict of interest and that he has amassed a fortune since losing his VP job

All SJT wants to do is try and distract attention from that, by disputing something that has been well written about namely his court case in the UK which Gore may have technically won, but beyond that it was a big poke in the eye for the lard arsed fraudster.

It was. The judge agreed that most of what Gore said was correct.

Gore had the gall to try and say that the judgement in Britaan was to his favour without explaining what that was.

The Court found that he could display his AIT providing it was corrected in 9 major areas and that the British Education system took steps to ensure that all sides were explained.

Of course the ABC this evening didnt press him on his conflicts of interest, and the fact that the AIT is no more than a modern version of an prospectus, were those gullible people who have already invested may only get a return if he delivers on the major govt changes required. eg the Waxma Markey bill in USA and the ETS here.

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pubs.html?id=654

He has a clear conflict of interest.