<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rational Advice on ‘Carbon Act’ Censored</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/</link>
	<description>a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:45:29 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Bird</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/comment-page-2/#comment-119837</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=5582#comment-119837</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t contend any conspiracy theory. Thats an interesting debate. The debate goes like this:

Is there a conspiracy? Or are they just evil and stupid pack-animals.  I respect the former point of view but I take the latter perspective.  You don&#039;t need to infer a conspiracy with leftists, since they are just goose-stepping automatons. Worse than pack-animals. More like spineless insects.

 And it doesn&#039;t matter whose right or wrong in this debate, healthy debate that it is. What matters is that these people must be stopped. Since they are aiming to do exactly what they did with the malaria-control-centralization holocaust.  But the energy-deprivation crusade will kill far more people then their still ongoing efforts with malaria population eradication. 

You have misrepresented my point of view SJT. Filthy liar that you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t contend any conspiracy theory. Thats an interesting debate. The debate goes like this:</p>
<p>Is there a conspiracy? Or are they just evil and stupid pack-animals.  I respect the former point of view but I take the latter perspective.  You don&#8217;t need to infer a conspiracy with leftists, since they are just goose-stepping automatons. Worse than pack-animals. More like spineless insects.</p>
<p> And it doesn&#8217;t matter whose right or wrong in this debate, healthy debate that it is. What matters is that these people must be stopped. Since they are aiming to do exactly what they did with the malaria-control-centralization holocaust.  But the energy-deprivation crusade will kill far more people then their still ongoing efforts with malaria population eradication. </p>
<p>You have misrepresented my point of view SJT. Filthy liar that you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Marohasy &#187; Rational Advice on ‘Carbon Act’ Censored (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/comment-page-2/#comment-119790</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Marohasy &#187; Rational Advice on ‘Carbon Act’ Censored (Part 2)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=5582#comment-119790</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 1 of this series is here: http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 1 of this series is here: <a href="http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/" rel="nofollow">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJT</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/comment-page-2/#comment-119735</link>
		<dc:creator>SJT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=5582#comment-119735</guid>
		<description>&quot;Your continued clinging onto AGW skeptics = conspiracy theory is not justified by the facts. You should at least address continual indictments of skeptics – by opinion leaders of AGW.&quot;

Exhibit A.  G Bird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Your continued clinging onto AGW skeptics = conspiracy theory is not justified by the facts. You should at least address continual indictments of skeptics – by opinion leaders of AGW.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exhibit A.  G Bird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Bird</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/comment-page-2/#comment-119722</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=5582#comment-119722</guid>
		<description>No its no good hunter. They are liars. When asked for evidence they will not come up with it.  Thats just fraud. None of them have the evidence. Yet they have put us in an energy crisis just the same.  It does no good for you to pretend that this is not fraudulent malevolent behaviour.

Why fake reality to that extent? Pretending that they aren&#039;t filthy liars isn&#039;t going to reform their character.  Perhaps you&#039;ve just begun your investigation of these matters and so don&#039;t realise what these people are like. If not wake up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No its no good hunter. They are liars. When asked for evidence they will not come up with it.  Thats just fraud. None of them have the evidence. Yet they have put us in an energy crisis just the same.  It does no good for you to pretend that this is not fraudulent malevolent behaviour.</p>
<p>Why fake reality to that extent? Pretending that they aren&#8217;t filthy liars isn&#8217;t going to reform their character.  Perhaps you&#8217;ve just begun your investigation of these matters and so don&#8217;t realise what these people are like. If not wake up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hunter</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/comment-page-2/#comment-119720</link>
		<dc:creator>hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=5582#comment-119720</guid>
		<description>SJT,
That really was not a clear answer. 
Your continued clinging onto AGW skeptics = conspiracy theory is not justified by the facts. You should at least address continual indictments of skeptics - by opinion leaders of AGW.

Graeme,
With all respect, going straight to the insults and calling people liars is not very conducive to conversation. It doesn&#039;t work any better when Luke tries it, either. AGW is a social movement. People get more defensive of the beliefs, not less, when simply attacked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SJT,<br />
That really was not a clear answer.<br />
Your continued clinging onto AGW skeptics = conspiracy theory is not justified by the facts. You should at least address continual indictments of skeptics &#8211; by opinion leaders of AGW.</p>
<p>Graeme,<br />
With all respect, going straight to the insults and calling people liars is not very conducive to conversation. It doesn&#8217;t work any better when Luke tries it, either. AGW is a social movement. People get more defensive of the beliefs, not less, when simply attacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Bird</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/comment-page-2/#comment-119675</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=5582#comment-119675</guid>
		<description>What contrary evidence you moron SJT? Just present it? For our civilisational survival what we have to come down on is the obsessive lying that you represent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What contrary evidence you moron SJT? Just present it? For our civilisational survival what we have to come down on is the obsessive lying that you represent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJT</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/comment-page-2/#comment-119568</link>
		<dc:creator>SJT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=5582#comment-119568</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tell us how much dissent is OK before it drifts into denialism.&quot;

There is a very simple test.

*  Does the dissent address the issues raised by AGW, or does it create it&#039;s own version and attack them.

* Does the dissent accept any contrary evidence, no matter how bad.

* Does the dissent descend into lunatic conspiracy theories.

* Does the dissent understand the case for AGW.

I see people here failing that test constantly.  They do not understand the case for AGW, they believe any piece of non-science, such as Miskicolzci, they rant on about lunatic conspiracy theories, they construct elaborate straw man arguments, misrepresent the case put by the IPCC and indulge in frantic arm waving.  Denialism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tell us how much dissent is OK before it drifts into denialism.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is a very simple test.</p>
<p>*  Does the dissent address the issues raised by AGW, or does it create it&#8217;s own version and attack them.</p>
<p>* Does the dissent accept any contrary evidence, no matter how bad.</p>
<p>* Does the dissent descend into lunatic conspiracy theories.</p>
<p>* Does the dissent understand the case for AGW.</p>
<p>I see people here failing that test constantly.  They do not understand the case for AGW, they believe any piece of non-science, such as Miskicolzci, they rant on about lunatic conspiracy theories, they construct elaborate straw man arguments, misrepresent the case put by the IPCC and indulge in frantic arm waving.  Denialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hunter</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/comment-page-2/#comment-119513</link>
		<dc:creator>hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=5582#comment-119513</guid>
		<description>SJT,
Then it is time to shine, SJT. Tell us what you believe. Not what you read about defending Gore. Not cut-n-pastes of other reports. 
Tell us how much dissent is OK before it drifts into denialism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SJT,<br />
Then it is time to shine, SJT. Tell us what you believe. Not what you read about defending Gore. Not cut-n-pastes of other reports.<br />
Tell us how much dissent is OK before it drifts into denialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Pompe</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/comment-page-2/#comment-119430</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Pompe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=5582#comment-119430</guid>
		<description>SJT: &quot;Another waste of time nitpick, and it’s wrong.&quot;

It that case, don&#039;t you think you should stop nitpicking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SJT: &#8220;Another waste of time nitpick, and it’s wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>It that case, don&#8217;t you think you should stop nitpicking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJT</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/rational-advice-on-%e2%80%98carbon-act%e2%80%99-censored/comment-page-2/#comment-119393</link>
		<dc:creator>SJT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=5582#comment-119393</guid>
		<description>&quot;“Wicked denier scum hack” means “One who disagrees with any claim of AGW”.&quot;

Not at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;“Wicked denier scum hack” means “One who disagrees with any claim of AGW”.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
