Comments on: Modellers Remove Evidence of Cooling and Editor Removes Comment by Climate Sceptic

By: Climate Change and Global Warming | ClimateSeek

Climate Change and Global Warming | ClimateSeek — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:52:08 +0000

[...] the fourth author (the study would have been much easier to demonise if he’d been the lead). Some pretended he was anyway, and just for good measure accused him of being a ‘modeller’ as [...]

By: Matthew Wright

Matthew Wright — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:24:14 +0000

HA HA .. I can’t believe you are quoting from Junkscience.com — in 1998 they were running heaps of editorial against the “anti-tobacco” lobby. They claimed that there was no link between passive smoking and lung cancer. After one hell of a hefty lawsuit and some outing of internal documents the Tobacco lobby withdrew and gave up.

We’ve still got Junkscience – sponsored by Right Wind Cato and Heartland institutes and all their exxon mates. THey’ve just reinvented themselves — first they went after legitimate science showing the links between smoking and lung cancer. Now after losing that battle (LOSERS) they are trying to help other corporate interests by going against legitimate scientists ringing the alarm bells on the threat of accelerating global warming. (From huiman caused increases in Greenhouse gasses)

>Comment from: Chris Schoneveld January 23rd, 2009 at 9:33 pm

>How do the authors of the paper explain the UAH MSU Polar temperature anomaly graph for the >Lower Troposphere?
>http://www.junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/UAHMSUSPol.html

>It doesn’t cover al the polar region (like the central part of the Antarctica which unequivocally has >cooled anyway) but it sure is an indication that the southern polar region has been warming >during the satellite era..

By: James P

James P — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:35:51 +0000

“a few disreputable apples like Mann have managed to so spoil the entire barrel”

It sounds like scientists are in the same boat as economists – they both have their Bernard Madoffs …

By: Jennifer Marohasy » Led Author of ‘Antarctic Warming Paper’ Claims Libel

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:59:05 +0000

[...] 3. My initial response to the Steig et al article can be found as a blog post here: http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/01/modellers-remove-evidence-of-cooling-and-editor-removes-com... [...]

By: ConspiracyWatch « Not a Hedgehog

ConspiracyWatch « Not a Hedgehog — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:49:15 +0000

[...] reflecting that bias. Except when one of the other contributors to the segment had his explanation misreported to the point of silliness – that kind of thing can just be [...]

By: Louis Hissink

Louis Hissink — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:39:18 +0000

I have listened to Kinninmonth’s comments.

The ABC “addition” omits the preceding question, so Kinninmonth’s comments are out of context. It took me a few seconds to work out that Kinninmonth was responding to a question that does not exist in the official archived transcript.

Lynsenkoism par excellence.

Well Done Oy Bee Cee and that fundamentalist Fabian Robyn Williams.

By: Jennifer Marohasy » Editor Removes Comment by Climate Sceptic (Part 2)

Jennifer Marohasy » Editor Removes Comment by Climate Sceptic (Part 2) — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:41:53 +0000

[...] 3. Jennifer Marohasy, Modellers remove evidence of cooling, January 23, 2009 http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/01/modellers-remove-evidence-of-cooling-and-editor-removes-com... [...]

By: Big Boy

Big Boy — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:48:50 +0000

I did like the article & the rather humorous remark (wrongly) attributed to Prof. Brooke. I would have to side with the ‘deniers’ on the AGW debate as they seem to be the only ones following scientific method.

By: Climate Research News » Some Reactions to Antarctic ‘Warming’ Study

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:58:32 +0000

[...] Modellers Remove Evidence of Cooling and Editor Removes Comment by Climate Sceptic [...]

By: janama

janama — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:35:12 +0000

Plus there are the aussie stations Cohenite mentioned.

http://users.tpg.com.au/johnsay1/Stuff/stations_oz.jpg