<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sydney Morning Herald Open to Letters from Skeptics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/11/sydney-morning-herald-open-to-letters-from-skeptics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/11/sydney-morning-herald-open-to-letters-from-skeptics/</link>
	<description>a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:46:15 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pike</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/11/sydney-morning-herald-open-to-letters-from-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-71162</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=3188#comment-71162</guid>
		<description>What a self serving load of tripe from Mr. Ticher.
Why, Mr Ticher, is Climate Change any more of a &quot;problematic issue&quot; than other contentious issues?
You fly your true colours, Mr. Ticher, when you say that to print the views of sceptics is to be; &quot;accused of airing theories with as little credibility as creationism.&quot; without recognising the sensationalist scaremongering of the IPCC and its deciples.
Accused by whom, Mr. Ticher? Others at Fairfax, perhaps!
As politely as I can, I have to say that the SMH has an increasingly sceptical readership who are deeply concerned at the symbiotic relationship that has verdantly developed between some journalists and environmentalists.
This agressive mistletoe of controled and supressed and often totally false information is slowly destroying the once proud reputation of your Masthead.
Truth and balance has been sadly lacking in the SMH for too long.
Pikey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a self serving load of tripe from Mr. Ticher.<br />
Why, Mr Ticher, is Climate Change any more of a &#8220;problematic issue&#8221; than other contentious issues?<br />
You fly your true colours, Mr. Ticher, when you say that to print the views of sceptics is to be; &#8220;accused of airing theories with as little credibility as creationism.&#8221; without recognising the sensationalist scaremongering of the IPCC and its deciples.<br />
Accused by whom, Mr. Ticher? Others at Fairfax, perhaps!<br />
As politely as I can, I have to say that the SMH has an increasingly sceptical readership who are deeply concerned at the symbiotic relationship that has verdantly developed between some journalists and environmentalists.<br />
This agressive mistletoe of controled and supressed and often totally false information is slowly destroying the once proud reputation of your Masthead.<br />
Truth and balance has been sadly lacking in the SMH for too long.<br />
Pikey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
