a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment
(14) (1) (2) (6) (116) (10) (3) (1) (15) (2) (1936) (1) (2) (5) (7) (4) (9) (104) (9) (483) (1) (4) (15) (3) (1) (8) (1) (1)Scientist Steve Schneider Flips Fears
On the TV show In Search Of…The Coming Ice Age, Steven Schneider wonders whether mankind should intervene in staving off a coming ice age. Watch the old footage on YouTube here. (24)
Australian Liberals Oppose Carbon Trading
Australian Opposition Leader (Malcolm Turnbull) will be forced to stare down more than two-thirds of the Liberal back bench if he proceeds with his plan to negotiate with the government over amendments to the emissions trading scheme before December’s Copenhagen climate change conference. Read more here. (2)
Not Evil Just Wrong
Buy the DVD by clicking on the flashing icon above. (1)
Climate Change Summit in New York
In New York… Chinese leader Hu Jintao … U.S. President Barack Obama more or less shuffled climate control policy off into the great dreamscape of unattainable plans and long range objectives. Like equality for all and peace in our time … Terence Corcoran, Financial Post (1)
Minerals Industry Now Complaining
THE [Australian] minerals industry has demanded [the Prime Minister] Kevin Rudd overhaul his proposed emissions trading system or risk smashing Australian jobs and the nation’s industrial competitiveness. Read more here. (1)
Disclaimer: The inclusion of a blog or website in this list should not be taken as an endorsement of its contents by me.
Posted by Charlotte Ramotswe, November 15th, 2008 - under News.
Nuclear power plants smaller than a garden shed and able to power 20,000 homes will be on sale within five years, say scientists at Los Alamos, the US government laboratory which developed the first atomic bomb. Read more here.
This appears to be a pretty amazing breakthrough – described as ‘leapfrog technology’.
It seems the International Energy Agency were not planning on industry by-passing government – they predicted a drop in demand for nuclear energy see: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE4AB2QB20081112
This is not what I heard from Elizabeth Sellers, one of the managers of Idaho National Laboratories last Thursday at Utah State University. She said that the current cost of Nuclear power at 1.5 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh) is not realistically going to be what we will have to pay in the future because all the current plants have been written off completely due to the fact we have not licensed or built any new nuclear plants for almost three decades. She has information that power from new nuclear power plants that are fully capitalized would cost over 10 times as much or 15-18 cents per kw hour and as far as I could tell from her presentation this was the cost to the utility or wholesale cost and was then marked up 4-5 fold to pay for getting it to the customer, my own estimation would be 60-80 cents per kwh (I currently pay about 8 cents). This is not competitive with coal at 2.25 cent per kWh and coal was fully capitalized funding new plants. When I asked her about it she said she did not know how to solve the “conundrum” financially, but she said only one coal plant in Illinois was licensed in the whole country during the last year because no one wants them in their backyard. From her comments, going off coal looks like a financial impossibility to me. Candles anyone??