Your arguments are without reason and your comments are as misinformed as any I have read on the internet. Quite a feat when you think about it.

It’s always amazing to hear someone believe something so strongly yet have no real knowledge of what they are talking about.

I have been a little mean to you Graeme, kind of like messing with an angry child. So I’ll let you have the last word. You have been good for a few laughs though.

Really you should calm down man. Life is too short and all kinds of politicized beliefs will be forced down our throats whether we like it or not.

You have convinced me that you are completely off your wagon and quite frightening really. You have referred to me by every name you can think of threatened my physically and all over the fact that you cannot understand a theory you dispute.

I will make one more point to you.

I said,
“There is no point where you cannot speed up.”

You answered.
I agree. But here you contradict special relativity as understood by the priesthood.

This is a mis-characterization of Relativity Theory by you. One of probably a dozen you made.

Really any low level physics course would do you a lot of good.

I suggest you take your meds, calm down get a physics book and read it slowly. After you’re done you can make a much stronger argument for your case. Whatever it is.

You also might get some insight into why your links above aren’t really breaking the speed of light.

So its a bit like the global warming racket. The main difference is that special relativity was at least a pretty good predictive template that served reasonably well for a time. Whereas the global warming idiocy cannot be used to predict anything. It doesn’t even backtest.

You can brush it off fella. But the evidence just isn’t there. Thats why you’ve suddenly fallen away in your argumentative ability displayed elsewhere.

This is why you are forced into going about things on a need to know basis.

Its a stupid paradigm this special relativity. Hence you are backing a dead horse. A paradigm at least four decades out of date. If you made arguments in favour of it certain internal inconsistencies would become obvious.

So instead you have hidden under the desk and are now doing things on a need to know basis.

This is cowardly Pompe. You ought to defend this fantasy-paradigm or admit its indefensible.

You are a coward.

Phillip Adams had a fellow on who had discovered how wrong it was. So he then had a believer on a couple of weeks later. The believer didn’t come up with any evidence to defend it beyond saying that it was aesthetically beautiful.

You Pompe haven’t even come up with anything so feeble as THAT.

You are still lying about this. You haven’t come up with any evidence for the wild conjectures that you are mindlessly parrotting.

Have you considered counseling?

No it’s because it’s better discussed on the back porch over a bottle of red and a plate (or two) of cheese and crackers.

That leaves us with an argument deficit. Doesn’t it?

YES IT DOES!!!!

So lets go over it again!!!!!

Where is your evidence for a universal speed limit?

Where is your evidence for all these wrong and bizzare assertions that you have been making?

Its not there is it?

You cannot find it?

You are just an idiot mate.

If you cannot understand the theory you dispute how can we take you seriously about your own irrational theories.

Best Regards,

The Dummy

You don’t have the evidence for anything else. Don’t pretend that you do.

There is no little man travelling on the leading wave and if there was he wouldn’t experience time differently in accordance with his speed. Its logically contradictory to say he would, since all velocities are relative.