<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Banner, Format and Policies for the Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/</link>
	<description>a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:08:22 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Bird</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-61543</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=2075#comment-61543</guid>
		<description>What is your problem Curtain you jerk?

Don&#039;t be picking fights with people who haven&#039;t picked a fight with you.

If you disagree with me on something why not pick me up on it specifically?

You sound like some sort of weakass triangulator. This is real malice motivating the other side. And its not the place of everyone here to be placid in the face of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your problem Curtain you jerk?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be picking fights with people who haven&#8217;t picked a fight with you.</p>
<p>If you disagree with me on something why not pick me up on it specifically?</p>
<p>You sound like some sort of weakass triangulator. This is real malice motivating the other side. And its not the place of everyone here to be placid in the face of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-61380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=2075#comment-61380</guid>
		<description>Hi Ian, My understanding is that with the new software I can post something from you and put you down as the author.  But I haven&#039;t worked out how to do this yet.  Indeed I have lots to learn.  And you may not have realized that the &#039;community page&#039; has its own thread http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/category/community/ .  You might want to leave a comment for Elizabeth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian, My understanding is that with the new software I can post something from you and put you down as the author.  But I haven&#8217;t worked out how to do this yet.  Indeed I have lots to learn.  And you may not have realized that the &#8216;community page&#8217; has its own thread <a href="http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/category/community/" rel="nofollow">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/category/community/</a> .  You might want to leave a comment for Elizabeth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Mott</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-61369</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Mott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=2075#comment-61369</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jen. I understood that to be the case. But on behalf of all the other non-authors of this site I ask if it is possible to alter the blog software, or search engine, so a simple search by Author name would produce a list of all articles &quot;attributed&quot; to each? At the moment all I got was a single 2005 piece where my name happened to be the first two words of a piece written by you.

I understand your predicament but there is no point in you complaining that other people&#039;s statements are being attached to yourself when your software continues to attribute the article to yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jen. I understood that to be the case. But on behalf of all the other non-authors of this site I ask if it is possible to alter the blog software, or search engine, so a simple search by Author name would produce a list of all articles &#8220;attributed&#8221; to each? At the moment all I got was a single 2005 piece where my name happened to be the first two words of a piece written by you.</p>
<p>I understand your predicament but there is no point in you complaining that other people&#8217;s statements are being attached to yourself when your software continues to attribute the article to yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-61357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=2075#comment-61357</guid>
		<description>Hi Ian, Numbers of &#039;authors&#039; etcetera has been automatically generated by the blogging software.  Your blog posts were posted by me, so your name is not displayed.   But at the actual post it should show that you were the author.   Old posts have not been changed.  And your contribution is valued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian, Numbers of &#8216;authors&#8217; etcetera has been automatically generated by the blogging software.  Your blog posts were posted by me, so your name is not displayed.   But at the actual post it should show that you were the author.   Old posts have not been changed.  And your contribution is valued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Mott</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-61348</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Mott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=2075#comment-61348</guid>
		<description>As one of the initial participants on this blog I was quite surprised to read that there has only been 4 authors, the least contributive supplying only 3 articles.  

Funny, I could have sworn that I posted more than a dozen, some of which took some considerable time to prepare.  So is this a case of being written out of history or just a failure to give proper attribution to the works of others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of the initial participants on this blog I was quite surprised to read that there has only been 4 authors, the least contributive supplying only 3 articles.  </p>
<p>Funny, I could have sworn that I posted more than a dozen, some of which took some considerable time to prepare.  So is this a case of being written out of history or just a failure to give proper attribution to the works of others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Curtin</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-61316</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Curtin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=2075#comment-61316</guid>
		<description>Jen

You should now by know that &quot;improvement&quot; means worse, especially with WordPress. It was always bad, and is even more so here now. One has to write on a postage stamp, there is no Preview that I can see, and as usual WordPress cannot cope with simple cut and paste from Word or Excel documents. It is a totally useless prgramme. And I see that Graeme Bird is as ever drunk whenever he posts on your blog. I am in favour of free speech but he ought to be subject to a breathalyzer test before his posts are accpted (like almost all of the remaining handful of posters to Quiggin and Lambert including &#039;em).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jen</p>
<p>You should now by know that &#8220;improvement&#8221; means worse, especially with WordPress. It was always bad, and is even more so here now. One has to write on a postage stamp, there is no Preview that I can see, and as usual WordPress cannot cope with simple cut and paste from Word or Excel documents. It is a totally useless prgramme. And I see that Graeme Bird is as ever drunk whenever he posts on your blog. I am in favour of free speech but he ought to be subject to a breathalyzer test before his posts are accpted (like almost all of the remaining handful of posters to Quiggin and Lambert including &#8216;em).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NT</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-61269</link>
		<dc:creator>NT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=2075#comment-61269</guid>
		<description>I like the new policies of this blog. You can put up whatever crazy ideas you like, not actually use any physics, and label anyone who question syou a fraud. Nice start Graeme, glad to see that some things never change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new policies of this blog. You can put up whatever crazy ideas you like, not actually use any physics, and label anyone who question syou a fraud. Nice start Graeme, glad to see that some things never change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Bird</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-61238</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=2075#comment-61238</guid>
		<description>No I&#039;m not wrong. But then you being a compulsive liar would say that.

We can tell the sincere from the leftist phonies. For example I would still put Mitchell Porter in the alarmist camp. But he is an intelligent fellow who is investigating this matter, in a reasoned way, seemingly for the first time.

Now he might in the end sway with the mob and not have the independence of mind to break free from them.

But at this stage we can see the honest enquirers and differentiate them from the obvious fakes and bully-boys such as yourself, Luke, NT, SJT, Bernhard and others. Notice that you are all anonymous frauds. Whereas there are other unscientists who will comment about what is said here but will never show up under their actual identity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I&#8217;m not wrong. But then you being a compulsive liar would say that.</p>
<p>We can tell the sincere from the leftist phonies. For example I would still put Mitchell Porter in the alarmist camp. But he is an intelligent fellow who is investigating this matter, in a reasoned way, seemingly for the first time.</p>
<p>Now he might in the end sway with the mob and not have the independence of mind to break free from them.</p>
<p>But at this stage we can see the honest enquirers and differentiate them from the obvious fakes and bully-boys such as yourself, Luke, NT, SJT, Bernhard and others. Notice that you are all anonymous frauds. Whereas there are other unscientists who will comment about what is said here but will never show up under their actual identity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gavin</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-61235</link>
		<dc:creator>gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=2075#comment-61235</guid>
		<description>&quot;These guys really are frauds. These are leftists who appear here for purposes of character assasination and to keep this science fraud going. The list of other reasons for them being here is short in length and feeble as to the strength of these supplementary motivations&quot;

Wrong Graeme on every point! I reckon it is you who is offside with the main game most of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These guys really are frauds. These are leftists who appear here for purposes of character assasination and to keep this science fraud going. The list of other reasons for them being here is short in length and feeble as to the strength of these supplementary motivations&#8221;</p>
<p>Wrong Graeme on every point! I reckon it is you who is offside with the main game most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Bird</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/new-banner-format-and-policies-for-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-61223</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=2075#comment-61223</guid>
		<description>&quot;While I don’t have a problem with what some would consider offensive ideas, I do have a problem with offensive behaviour in particular language that is designed to be personal and derogatory while not progressing understanding.&quot;

This really presents a serious problem. These guys really are frauds. These are leftists who appear here for purposes of character assasination and to keep this science fraud going. The list of other reasons for them being here is short in length and feeble as to the strength of these supplementary motivations.

They enter upon a relentless and eternal evidence filibuster which they will not break. Almost as if they were motivated by a perverse sense of honour cooked up by demonic nihilists and hobgoblins who hated science from its beginning.

Given the ill-will and malice of the proponents of the fraud side of the argument, any attempt to fake-up a collegial surface attitude to these societal sabouteurs would be dishonest. It would mislead third parties.

Think of why Luke, NT, Bernhard with his pompous pretensions to respectability, and SJT show up here. They aren&#039;t even a tiny bit interested or fascinated by the science. And they get in the way of climate rationalists sorting out their differences or asking eachother questions.

They are political extremists here to defame the blog owner and then they head off to Deltoid, Coby Becks, and the beloved Professor Brooks place to round out the defamation.

It is the fault of the climate rationalists that they have given blatant leftist science fraud the air of respectability by trying to revive some sort of collegial politeness under circumstances when such an attempt is inane.

Nature will not be deceived on this matter. And third parties seeing the abuse from one side and the exaserbated politeness from the other will conclude instinctively who is on the top of the food chain and they will fall into line accordingly.

Being respectful in response to blatant science fraud and savage unreason is being deceptive. Its doing more harm then good. Its a focus on the purity of self rather than the need to destroy this movement and get on with the business of producing, consuming and exporting more energy every quarter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While I don’t have a problem with what some would consider offensive ideas, I do have a problem with offensive behaviour in particular language that is designed to be personal and derogatory while not progressing understanding.&#8221;</p>
<p>This really presents a serious problem. These guys really are frauds. These are leftists who appear here for purposes of character assasination and to keep this science fraud going. The list of other reasons for them being here is short in length and feeble as to the strength of these supplementary motivations.</p>
<p>They enter upon a relentless and eternal evidence filibuster which they will not break. Almost as if they were motivated by a perverse sense of honour cooked up by demonic nihilists and hobgoblins who hated science from its beginning.</p>
<p>Given the ill-will and malice of the proponents of the fraud side of the argument, any attempt to fake-up a collegial surface attitude to these societal sabouteurs would be dishonest. It would mislead third parties.</p>
<p>Think of why Luke, NT, Bernhard with his pompous pretensions to respectability, and SJT show up here. They aren&#8217;t even a tiny bit interested or fascinated by the science. And they get in the way of climate rationalists sorting out their differences or asking eachother questions.</p>
<p>They are political extremists here to defame the blog owner and then they head off to Deltoid, Coby Becks, and the beloved Professor Brooks place to round out the defamation.</p>
<p>It is the fault of the climate rationalists that they have given blatant leftist science fraud the air of respectability by trying to revive some sort of collegial politeness under circumstances when such an attempt is inane.</p>
<p>Nature will not be deceived on this matter. And third parties seeing the abuse from one side and the exaserbated politeness from the other will conclude instinctively who is on the top of the food chain and they will fall into line accordingly.</p>
<p>Being respectful in response to blatant science fraud and savage unreason is being deceptive. Its doing more harm then good. Its a focus on the purity of self rather than the need to destroy this movement and get on with the business of producing, consuming and exporting more energy every quarter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
