Comments on: Blue Planet in Green Shackles: A Book by Vaclav Klaus

By: sjt

sjt — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:17:46 +0000

“I’m wondering why “david” hasn’t parroted “peer review” here? It wouldn’t be slightly political would it? I wonder if Al Gore was ever peer reviewed?”

He wasn’t, of course, just produced a documentary.

By: barryS

barryS — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:31:38 +0000

I’m wondering why “david” hasn’t parroted “peer review” here? It wouldn’t be slightly political would it? I wonder if Al Gore was ever peer reviewed?

By: ra

ra — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:25:32 +0000

Funny vid isn’t it. Hard to believe there are people actually like that. That’s why a great deal (though not all) of environmentalism is basically religious.

By: Gerry Pratt

Gerry Pratt — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:54:00 +0000

I have a copy of the book, and am very impressed with it’s contents. I just wish I could do something more to expose the great fraud as he has done.

By: J.Hansford.

J.Hansford. — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:51:45 +0000

LoL’ed at the vid’ Ra… Not sure if I’m watching theatrics or unreason? :-)

By: J.Hansford.

J.Hansford. — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:45:37 +0000

Ra…. No my friend… You must always keep in mind of how you look from a distance, or to somebody who has just walked in to the room. ;-)

By: ra

ra — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:39:35 +0000

Lukey, Brook, Ender and SJT wailing on a weekend away counting all the totally massive extinctions.

This has to be the funniest vid on the net.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSEaHyzbqTA&eurl=http://www.lindasog.com/archives/2008/09/todays_unintentional_comedy_go.html

J. Hansford, you’re giving the critters far too much respect. You need to treat SJT et al with all the disrespect they deserves.

By: J.Hansford.

J.Hansford. — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:35:24 +0000

SJT…. I have never found reading to be a waste of time…. It has always led me to a conclusion, positive or negative.

You may want to brush up on your comprehension skills if you find yourself bereft of insight. :-)

However considering that the last ten years have shown no warming, as per the AGW model, despite a 4%+ rise in Anthropogenic CO2.

Also considering that the accepted state of climate Theory is that change is Natural.

Considering that the onus is on those who pose alternative Climate Hypothesises, to prove Causation rather than just a vague Correlation.

It is quite understandable that Mr Klaus would view the current overblown state of affairs that now exists with AGW and it’s Proponents, with suspicion.

…. After all he has seen rabid Socialists in action before. Czechs suffered quite brutally at the hands of the Soviets.

By: Louis Hissink

Louis Hissink — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:29:46 +0000

Oh that is where they are – at the new Laugh-In site. Good on them.

By: ra

ra — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:18:15 +0000

Lukey:

You’re obsessed with Bird/Ra. Give it up as it will send you to the AGW asylum. Oops you’re already there.

You’re also worried about our warmer air spilling over into space and causing the universe’s temp to rise there too, right?