Comments on: More Hurricane Reality

By: cb

cb — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:29:18 +0000

Just an observation for you Global Warming kooks:
How can we accept as true these theoretical weather scientists about something that has purportedly caused a lot of studying over millions of man hours, if these same scientists can’t even agree on where a storm is going in real time?
The Earth has been around reasonably a long time, and will persist to subsist even well after us as a species are extinct. The earth goes through changes, just as women do, who’s to say that the same thing didn’t take place a million years ago? No one can. In the grand scheme of things a people as a whole are just specks on the big ass of Earth – so stop being so supercilious – you’re a bunch of Gores!

By: Luke

Luke — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:44:57 +0000

I won.

By: GraemeBird.

GraemeBird. — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:00:13 +0000

He’s an idiot Barry. But I’m not letting him get the last word in.

It would be appropriate if someone came in and just erased nine-tenths of the two-way communication between the both of us. But the fact is the leftist obsession with getting the last word in is powerfully malignant in its effectiveness. So much so that its driving this entire science fraud.

By: Luke

Luke — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:50:01 +0000

Excellent – a moron who supports Birdy – well we found one finally.

By: Barry Moore

Barry Moore — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:13:35 +0000

Graeme; Why do you even bother with this clown Luke he reminds me of Polly parrot he keeps repeating the same piece of inane stupidity over and over again, it reminds of the way children behave in a kindergarten schoolyard. I think it is becoming pretty obvious by now that the Kyoto accord which runs out in 2012 will never be resigned because to get the first one off the ground India and China were given a free ride Russia was allowed to use 1990 as their CO2 target which means they have $60 Billion of carbon credits to sell, these were the bribes handed out to get the first agreement signed, they will not be repeated so the next agreement is a no go. In addition in another 3 years the cooling trend will be well established so all the politicians who back this farce will be so disgraced that neither they nor their parties will have a hope in hell of getting back into power. I think the news media will be so busy pointing the finger at others to distract people from their own complicity in this swindle they will turn on the IPCC like the snakes they are ( Jen and a few others excepted)

By: Luke

Luke — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:40:09 +0000

No a single person can do it. What’s wrong with you pussy pants. Lordy you’re so piss weak. What a dweeb. You’re a clueless unelectable moron — GET OFF THIS BLOG. Useless handwaver that you are.

By: GraemeBird.

GraemeBird. — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:18:40 +0000

If I thought that seasonal weather forecasting was suitable for a part-time unfunded one man gig THATS WHAT I WOULD HAVE SAID YOU MORON.

I didn’t say that. I said that climate science was by its nature easy. I never claimed that it was a one-man-gig. Its a civilisational gig. But the work is straightforward.

In economics the good stuff comes through the British classical school and through Menger, Boehm Bawerk, Mises, Hutt, Rothbard, Reisman and others. Its harder than climate science. But its not a one-man-gig.

And climate science is actually reliant on far more people than economics.

Now stop being an idiot. And if you disagree with me find some evidence-or-argument that falsifies what I’m saying or verifies something contrary to what I’m saying.

You might have been trained to think that science was about maths, statistics and field-work and thats all important stuff. But human reason is the essence of science. And the others things are tools that are useless or even destructive in the wrong hands.

You can use hammers, saws, drills, screwdrivers and dingo diggers to make a house. But you need human reason behind these tools. Without that reason you’ve got a vandal. The tools are worse than useless. You have someone sawing down the tree to your treehut. Or you have the Texas chainsaw massacre.

By: Luke

Luke — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:58:58 +0000

Well if it’s “easy” and you know so much you’ll have done a simple seasonal climate forecast. NOT a weather report. Now I reckon you’re a lying little fatso cissy – so put up or GET OFF THE BLOG.

I don’t want to hear all the repetitious stupid nonsense you’ve read off Weetbix blogs – forget about AGW for a while – I want your science mate. But if you are just a friggin wannabe idiot say so and we can walk away.

By: GraemeBird.

GraemeBird. — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:14:40 +0000

No no. The proposition is this: Climate science is easy.

And it is. Because its just basic science applied to explaining the massive geological record.

“the carbon dioxide levels were roughly 16 times higher than today.”

Obviously any Arrenhius based model that cannot account for the conditions 440 million years ago cannot be thought of as scientific. Same goes for the heat maximum and the rest of the data.

There is just so much data. There is no excuse for having an understanding of climate in contradiction to any of it. This makes the subject incredibly easy by its nature. One just forms ones hypotheses on the basis of the evidence.

By: Luke

Luke — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:11:26 +0000

All of that contains no information whatsoever. All filler.

“I made a lot of predictions” OK – well show us the hindcast stats then and we can evaluate.