<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Environmentalism Can’t Replace Religion: A Note from Ian Plimer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/</link>
	<description>a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:04:41 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Marohasy</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/comment-page-4/#comment-59038</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Marohasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=1990#comment-59038</guid>
		<description>Thread closed because of ongoing spam attacks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thread closed because of ongoing spam attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GraemeBird.</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/comment-page-4/#comment-59037</link>
		<dc:creator>GraemeBird.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=1990#comment-59037</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anything could well be happening. That&#039;s why scientists have been investigating all kinds of things for many years now, to see why things happen.&quot;

Science-workers SJT. Field workers. And no they haven&#039;t been doing that. They have instead tried to prove that industrial-CO2 was making the changes. And it wasn&#039;t.

Now your point was that there ought not be this change to the climate. I said the climate always changes. And that were we having any effect it might be to slow the rate of change.

My total neutralisation of your idiotic point stands.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anything could well be happening. That&#8217;s why scientists have been investigating all kinds of things for many years now, to see why things happen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Science-workers SJT. Field workers. And no they haven&#8217;t been doing that. They have instead tried to prove that industrial-CO2 was making the changes. And it wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Now your point was that there ought not be this change to the climate. I said the climate always changes. And that were we having any effect it might be to slow the rate of change.</p>
<p>My total neutralisation of your idiotic point stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJT</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/comment-page-4/#comment-59036</link>
		<dc:creator>SJT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=1990#comment-59036</guid>
		<description>&quot;The contradictory religion of environmentalism has given people a purpose in life and, despite ignoring all the contrary science, this religion provides some of the stitches that hold the fabric of society together.&quot;

Is Socratic Ignorance science now?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The contradictory religion of environmentalism has given people a purpose in life and, despite ignoring all the contrary science, this religion provides some of the stitches that hold the fabric of society together.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is Socratic Ignorance science now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJT</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/comment-page-4/#comment-59035</link>
		<dc:creator>SJT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=1990#comment-59035</guid>
		<description>&quot;I quite agree, acomplia. I assume that was a comment on SJT&#039;s &#039;logic&#039;.&quot;

So you have nothing to say?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I quite agree, acomplia. I assume that was a comment on SJT&#8217;s &#8216;logic&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>So you have nothing to say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Davey Gam Esq.</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/comment-page-4/#comment-59034</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Davey Gam Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=1990#comment-59034</guid>
		<description>I quite agree, acomplia. I assume that was a comment on SJT&#039;s &#039;logic&#039;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite agree, acomplia. I assume that was a comment on SJT&#8217;s &#8216;logic&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJT</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/comment-page-4/#comment-59033</link>
		<dc:creator>SJT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=1990#comment-59033</guid>
		<description>&quot;B. You may think that papers in refereed journals are &#039;Holy Writ&#039;, but it has been pointed out that scientists, being humans, often have &#039;tacit presuppositions&#039; (Michael Polanyi 1962 &#039;Personal Knowledge&#039;, Uni of Chicago Press).&quot;

Not at all, this is what annoys the hell out of me, people assuming they know what I am thinking, and even why I am thinking it, even though I&#039;m not.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;B. You may think that papers in refereed journals are &#8216;Holy Writ&#8217;, but it has been pointed out that scientists, being humans, often have &#8216;tacit presuppositions&#8217; (Michael Polanyi 1962 &#8216;Personal Knowledge&#8217;, Uni of Chicago Press).&#8221;</p>
<p>Not at all, this is what annoys the hell out of me, people assuming they know what I am thinking, and even why I am thinking it, even though I&#8217;m not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJT</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/comment-page-4/#comment-59032</link>
		<dc:creator>SJT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=1990#comment-59032</guid>
		<description>&quot;Our actions, if they have any effect at all, could well be reducing the rate of change, given that climate change is a constant.&quot;

Anything could well be happening. That&#039;s why scientists have been investigating all kinds of things for many years now, to see why things happen.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Our actions, if they have any effect at all, could well be reducing the rate of change, given that climate change is a constant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anything could well be happening. That&#8217;s why scientists have been investigating all kinds of things for many years now, to see why things happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GraemeBird.</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/comment-page-4/#comment-59031</link>
		<dc:creator>GraemeBird.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=1990#comment-59031</guid>
		<description>Our actions, if they have any effect at all, could well be reducing the rate of change, given that climate change is a constant.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our actions, if they have any effect at all, could well be reducing the rate of change, given that climate change is a constant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJT</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/comment-page-4/#comment-59030</link>
		<dc:creator>SJT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=1990#comment-59030</guid>
		<description>&quot;C. Disturbance of a complex system (I am wary of your rhetorical &#039;disruption&#039;) will probably change it, but for how long, and in what direction? &#039;Better&#039; and &#039;worse&#039; are human perceptions. &#039;Nature&#039; has no particular preference for forest, grassland, tundra, or desert.&quot;

I know, and the rocks have been doing well as well.  We depend on a certain stability in our environment.  To say that because we can&#039;t describe that precisely, therefore there is no need to worry about it, is wilful ignorance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;C. Disturbance of a complex system (I am wary of your rhetorical &#8216;disruption&#8217;) will probably change it, but for how long, and in what direction? &#8216;Better&#8217; and &#8216;worse&#8217; are human perceptions. &#8216;Nature&#8217; has no particular preference for forest, grassland, tundra, or desert.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know, and the rocks have been doing well as well.  We depend on a certain stability in our environment.  To say that because we can&#8217;t describe that precisely, therefore there is no need to worry about it, is wilful ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJT</title>
		<link>http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/08/environmentalism-can%e2%80%99t-replace-religion-a-note-from-ian-plimer/comment-page-4/#comment-59029</link>
		<dc:creator>SJT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/?p=1990#comment-59029</guid>
		<description>&quot;A. Of course I cannot explain gravity, but I can define it reasonably well. Neither you, nor I, nor Claude Shannon, nor Charlie Krebs, can define &#039;biodiversity&#039;. So predictions of changes in it are largely hot air.&quot;

No you can say things fall down, that things attract, with what force, over distance.  I can describe how it behaves quite well, although even then there are questions over larger distances. I can say what a lion eats, and how much nutrition it needs each day to live, what rate it breeds at, how long it lives, plenty of observational facts and evidence.  As for how gravity works, it&#039;s still a mystery, but we are working hard at it.  Similary for bio diversity.  It is the interdependence of species, and we can describe a lot of those interactions.  No one is trying to describe changing those interactions, they are just saying we can disrupt the system with climate change.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A. Of course I cannot explain gravity, but I can define it reasonably well. Neither you, nor I, nor Claude Shannon, nor Charlie Krebs, can define &#8216;biodiversity&#8217;. So predictions of changes in it are largely hot air.&#8221;</p>
<p>No you can say things fall down, that things attract, with what force, over distance.  I can describe how it behaves quite well, although even then there are questions over larger distances. I can say what a lion eats, and how much nutrition it needs each day to live, what rate it breeds at, how long it lives, plenty of observational facts and evidence.  As for how gravity works, it&#8217;s still a mystery, but we are working hard at it.  Similary for bio diversity.  It is the interdependence of species, and we can describe a lot of those interactions.  No one is trying to describe changing those interactions, they are just saying we can disrupt the system with climate change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
