jennifermarohasy.com/blog - The Politics and Environment Blog

Main menu:

 

June 2005
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Tags

Archives

Authors

Site search

Miniposts 0.6.5

Methane Leak
Scientists have discovered the Arctic ocean seabed is leaking huge amounts of methane into the atmosphere.  The research published in the journal Science shows the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic shelf, which was thought to be a barrier sealing methane, is perforated.  Read more here. (1)

NYT: Pachauri Faces Credibility Siege
The New York Times is reporting that: Dr. Pachauri and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are now under intense scrutiny, facing accusations of scientific sloppiness and potential financial conflicts of interest from climate skeptics, right-leaning politicians and even some mainstream scientists.  More here. (1)

Phil Jones Guilty, But
The university at the centre of the climate change row over stolen e-mails broke the law by refusing to hand over its raw data for public scrutiny.  B ut…  Read more here. (0)

Banks Leave Carbon Market
Banks and investors are pulling out of the carbon market after the failure to make progress at Copenhagen on reaching new emissions targets after 2012.  Read more here. (0)

UK Met Office Can't Forecast Weather
The UK Met Office is debating what to do with its long-term and seasonal forecasting after criticism for failing to predict extreme weather.   It was predicted that this winter would be warmer than average – yet it has been unusually cold.  Read more here. (2)

Advertisement

Links

Disclaimer: The inclusion of a blog or website in this list should not be taken as an endorsement of its contents by me.

Stop Global Warming, Stop Burning-Off in the NT

Maybe I have been a bit harsh with my title for this post? Then again, I am, after all, at heart, a global warming skeptic.

And now the NT government is proposing aboriginals stop burning-off to reduce C02 emmissions.

“Government figures show the Territory has Australia’s highest rate of emissions per person. The service’s hazard reduction officer, Patrick Skewes, says Indigenous land owners and communities need to change the way they use fire.

“They need to understand the damage that they’re doing too and that’s an educational program,” he said. “Just because you’ve had a bad habit for 100 years doesn’t mean to say that it’s a good thing … bad habits become cultural as well.”

Would this be a good outcome for the NT environment? Is there too much burning-off in the NT?

At this blog David Ward from WA has suggested:

“By insisting, through our political representatives, that CALM burn the bush more often, and more patchily, we will make it safer, see more wildflowers, avoid most animal deaths, and avoid dense, choking smoke from fierce wildfires. We will have to live with occasional light smoke from prescribed burns. If most litter were less than five years old, smoke would be minimal, and arson would be futile. All it could cause would be a mild, creeping fire, which would benefit the bush.

Think of the savings and benefits by working with nature, instead of fighting it. No more squadrons of aircraft, anxious home owners, and choking smoke for a week or more. The police could get on with catching burglars. More young Noongar people should be employed by CALM to help manage the bush with fire, restoring their culture and healing their self esteem.”

Read Ward’s entire post at http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/000672.html

Advertisement

9 Responses to “Stop Global Warming, Stop Burning-Off in the NT”

  1. Comment from: Louis Hissink


    Delegating burning to CALM might have mixed blessings, but as some one who lived at the Top End, controlled burning rather than anarchic burning, which is the traditional way, might overall be better.

    But CALM is at the mercy of the Greenies, so this change in policy may well result in some unwanted disasters.

    As for the link to global warming, that is nothing but a mindless bureaucratic justification and politically expedient.

    The problem is that we introduced cattle – and their feedstock is profoundly affected by burning. Traditional owners seem blissfully unaware of this “problem”.

  2. Comment from: David Ward


    My money is on the Aborigines.

  3. Comment from: Louis Hissink


    Surely that depends on funding.

  4. Comment from: David Ward


    I’ve got it…Aboriginal burning caused the Medieval Warm Period. They were secretly funded, of course, by the right-wing Vintners Guild of London, who wanted to grow grapes in England, so they could drown Dukes in vats of Malmsey. The Greenland Viking settlers kicked in a few krone too.
    But the Aborigines got a bit too enthusiastic, and their smoke blotted out the sun, causing the Little Ice Age, when the River Thames froze, and oxen were roasted thereon. The poor old Greenlanders froze and starved, and even the horns dropped off their helmets.
    The Vintners and Greenlanders withdrew funding, but the Aborigines enjoyed burning so much they continued. They also found it increased their food supply, and made the bush safer. Smoke assumed an important spiritual significance for them, and fire had an important connection with land ownership.
    Should I pass this important new information on to the Northern Territory Government environmental think-tank? Anybody got their email address?

  5. Comment from: Tom Marland


    Touch’e David Ward!

    I think a simple explanation is that it is not ‘if’ the land is burned but ‘when’.

    Controlled and calculated burning regimes have, as David suggests, been implemented in the Australian landscape for 40,000 years. To call this a ‘bad habit’ which has generated in the past ‘100 years’ is ludicrous.

    Sadly this is the logic and clear thinking which currently dictates landuse managment in Australia.

  6. Comment from: David Ward


    Tom, and others, may be interested in the fascinating similarities between Australian Aboriginal burning and that by hunter gatherers in other parts of the world, including Africa, Asia, and Europe.

    For America, an excellent list of references has been created by Dr. Gerry Williams of the USDA Forest Service – he mentions other distinguished fire history scholars such as Prof. Steven Pyne and Prof. Hank Lewis. I suggest the NT Government environmental think tank should visit http://www.wildlandfire.com/docs/biblio_indianfire.htm – happy reading!

  7. Comment from: David Ward


    If I may have another bite at the cherry, there is a very interesting map, showing the contrasting fire mosaic north and south of the US/Mexico border, in California. South of the border, I understand that few fires are suppressed, and consequently few large fires occur, since they run into recently burnt areas, North of the border, US fire fighters attack with water bombers, fire trucks, helicopters etc. When a fire does get away, it is large and dangerous, due to the greater extent of heavy fuel.

    It would be interesting to know how these contrasting fire mosaics measure up for conservation of native plants and animals, not to mention human safety.

    The paper is ‘An Integrated Model of Two Fire Regimes’, by Richard A. Minnich, Conservation Biology Vol.15, No. 6, Dec 2001. It can be seen at: http://nature.berkeley.edu/stephens-lab/Minnich.pdf

  8. Comment from: Spooler_Go_87


    HI! I’am Spooler_Go_87.
    Please visit my blog.
    Thanks.

  9. Comment from: Ken Ring


    So far not one Aborigine has expressed fear that global warming is a problem. Not one tribe is saying..oh gee, it’s gettin too hot for us now, we gotta move south. And I wonder which culture lives in the hottest parts of the country. I wonder which culture would be the first to know global warming had arrived. Believe it, those guys know about climate cycles. Ask them. We won’t ask them, because we don’t want to hear the truth. Global warming is not an issue for anyone except politicians wanting to get kickbacks from certain energy suppliers and wanting to impose carbon taxes. It’s also an issue for the gullible, because we the non-indigenous know zilch about the land and the climate. Forget the BoM. Go ask the Abos.