jennifermarohasy.com/blog - The Politics and Environment Blog

Main menu:

 

April 2005
M T W T F S S
    May »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Tags

Archives

Authors

Site search

Miniposts 0.6.5

Methane Leak
Scientists have discovered the Arctic ocean seabed is leaking huge amounts of methane into the atmosphere.  The research published in the journal Science shows the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic shelf, which was thought to be a barrier sealing methane, is perforated.  Read more here. (0)

NYT: Pachauri Faces Credibility Siege
The New York Times is reporting that: Dr. Pachauri and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are now under intense scrutiny, facing accusations of scientific sloppiness and potential financial conflicts of interest from climate skeptics, right-leaning politicians and even some mainstream scientists.  More here. (1)

Phil Jones Guilty, But
The university at the centre of the climate change row over stolen e-mails broke the law by refusing to hand over its raw data for public scrutiny.  B ut…  Read more here. (0)

Banks Leave Carbon Market
Banks and investors are pulling out of the carbon market after the failure to make progress at Copenhagen on reaching new emissions targets after 2012.  Read more here. (0)

UK Met Office Can't Forecast Weather
The UK Met Office is debating what to do with its long-term and seasonal forecasting after criticism for failing to predict extreme weather.   It was predicted that this winter would be warmer than average – yet it has been unusually cold.  Read more here. (2)

Advertisement

Links

Disclaimer: The inclusion of a blog or website in this list should not be taken as an endorsement of its contents by me.

$10,000 funding limit misleading

The impression from the media over the last week has been that green groups are now only going to get a maximum of $10,000 each year in funding from the government

The reality is quite different.

Some groups will have their federal government funding cut. The Queensland Conservation Council, for example, received $92,000 in funding under the Grants to Voluntary Environmental and Heritage Organisations Scheme (GVEHO) and will now receive a maximum of $10,000 under this scheme.

But the organization will continue to pick up government money from other sources.

Tax payer’s money is also likely to keep rolling in to WWF. This organization received over $15 million in federal government grants over the period 1996-2003. (See Australian Institute Report by Clive Hamilton and Andrew Macintosh titled Taming the Panda).

Not only will WWF continue to be funded by the federal government, but WWF is actually in-charge of providing federal government funding to community groups.

Through the WWF-administered, government-funded Threatened Species Network Community Grants program WWF provides funding of up to $50,000 per annum to green groups. This is part of the billion dollar Natural Heritage Trust Fund.

There is also the $1.4 billion National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality.

As part of the Federal Government’s $2 billion Australian Water Fund, $200 million will be available over the next 5 years for community grants of up to $50,000 to save and protect water resources through practical on-the-ground work.

And the list goes on, and on and on.

Advertisement

One Response to “$10,000 funding limit misleading”

  1. Comment from: Glynne Tosh


    Jennifer you are right, but his is a small start and it doesn’t stop the same six people applying under all these pseudo groups and associations and recieving multiple lots of funding from the one source. I have been lobbying for this to be tackled for 15 years as it makes it very hard to counter their proparganda when we do not have the funding. But it is a start.

Leave a Reply